From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Don Fry <pcnet32@verizon.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
corbet@lwn.net, eteo@redhat.com, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: VLB support fixes
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:46:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907302346.26017.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A721163.7030700@garzik.org>
On Thursday 30 July 2009 23:32:19 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] pcnet32: VLB support fixes
> >
> > VLB support has been broken since at least 2004-2005 period as some
> > changes introduced back then assumed that ->pci_dev is always valid,
> > lets try to fix it:
> >
> > - remove duplicated SET_NETDEV_DEV() call
> >
> > - call SET_NETDEV_DEV() only for PCI devices
> >
> > - check for ->pci_dev validity in pcnet32_open()
> >
> > [ Alternatively we may consider removing VLB support but there would not
> > be much gain in it since an extra driver code needed for VLB support is
> > minimal and quite simple. ]
> >
> > This takes care of the following entry from Dan's list:
> >
> > drivers/net/pcnet32.c +1889 pcnet32_probe1(298) warning: variable derefenced before check 'pdev'
> >
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> > Cc: corbet@lwn.net
> > Cc: eteo@redhat.com
> > Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > PS I still keep the original cc: list from the smatch thread -- please let
> > me know if you don't want to be spammed.. ;-)
> >
> > drivers/net/pcnet32.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> ACK -- the patch is correct AFAICS -- but would it not be better to have
> a struct device for the VLB device?
Sure, such addition would be needed for sysfs support on VLB devices..
> We have capability to create struct device for isa and eisa, so VLB is
> quite doable.
>
> Jeff, who converted old-ISDN ISA+EISA+PCI drivers to
> hotplug model, once upon a time
..and it seems that you've the needed experience! :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-30 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-30 21:17 [PATCH] pcnet32: VLB support fixes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-30 21:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-30 21:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-07-30 21:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-07-30 22:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-07-31 18:45 ` Don Fry
2009-07-31 18:45 ` Don Fry
2009-08-02 19:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907302346.26017.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=eteo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcnet32@verizon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.