All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <ramon@risesecurity.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mszeredi@novell.com, hch@lst.de,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] XFS: __xfs_get_blocks check pointer to the target device
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:31:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804143142.GA6712@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249351241.7513.18.camel@logos>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:00:41PM -0300, Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 17:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 05:03:28PM -0300, Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote:
> > > The __xfs_get_blocks function does not check if the pointer to the target
> > > device is valid before dereferencing it.
> > 
> > It should never be zero.  It's set by xfs_imap_to_bmap to either
> > mp->m_ddev_targp which is always allocated, or to mp->m_rtdev_targp
> > which is always allocated if we have a realtime device, and
> > XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE should only be true in that case.
> > 
> 
> While testing XFS code with a modified version of fsfuzzer on SLES 10
> SP3 (Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.49.3.ramon-ppc64), I came across the following
> Oops:

So you actually introduced the RT flag in the inode on a filesystem
where it can't happen software-wise.

I'd rather deal with this early on to protect the invariant that's
guaranteed inside the xfs code.

Something like the following untested patch:

Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	2009-08-04 16:19:40.778532419 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	2009-08-04 16:28:06.352533058 +0200
@@ -343,6 +343,16 @@ xfs_iformat(
 		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely((ip->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME) &&
+		     !ip->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp)) {
+		xfs_fs_repair_cmn_err(CE_WARN, ip->i_mount,
+			"corrupt dinode %Lu, has realtime flag set.",
+			ip->i_ino);
+		XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR("xfs_iformat(realtime)",
+				     XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, ip->i_mount, dip);
+		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
+	}
+
 	switch (ip->i_d.di_mode & S_IFMT) {
 	case S_IFIFO:
 	case S_IFCHR:

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <ramon@risesecurity.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mszeredi@novell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] XFS: __xfs_get_blocks check pointer to the target device
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:31:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804143142.GA6712@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249351241.7513.18.camel@logos>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:00:41PM -0300, Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 17:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 05:03:28PM -0300, Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote:
> > > The __xfs_get_blocks function does not check if the pointer to the target
> > > device is valid before dereferencing it.
> > 
> > It should never be zero.  It's set by xfs_imap_to_bmap to either
> > mp->m_ddev_targp which is always allocated, or to mp->m_rtdev_targp
> > which is always allocated if we have a realtime device, and
> > XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE should only be true in that case.
> > 
> 
> While testing XFS code with a modified version of fsfuzzer on SLES 10
> SP3 (Kernel 2.6.16.60-0.49.3.ramon-ppc64), I came across the following
> Oops:

So you actually introduced the RT flag in the inode on a filesystem
where it can't happen software-wise.

I'd rather deal with this early on to protect the invariant that's
guaranteed inside the xfs code.

Something like the following untested patch:

Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	2009-08-04 16:19:40.778532419 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c	2009-08-04 16:28:06.352533058 +0200
@@ -343,6 +343,16 @@ xfs_iformat(
 		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely((ip->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_REALTIME) &&
+		     !ip->i_mount->m_rtdev_targp)) {
+		xfs_fs_repair_cmn_err(CE_WARN, ip->i_mount,
+			"corrupt dinode %Lu, has realtime flag set.",
+			ip->i_ino);
+		XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR("xfs_iformat(realtime)",
+				     XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, ip->i_mount, dip);
+		return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
+	}
+
 	switch (ip->i_d.di_mode & S_IFMT) {
 	case S_IFIFO:
 	case S_IFCHR:

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-04 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-03 20:03 [PATCH 1/1] XFS: __xfs_get_blocks check pointer to the target device Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-03 20:03 ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-03 21:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-03 21:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-04  2:00   ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-04  2:00     ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-04 14:31     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-08-04 14:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-04 16:25     ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-04 16:25       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-04 18:50       ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-04 18:50         ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-04 18:51       ` [PATCH 1/1] XFS: xfs_iformat realtime device target pointer check Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-04 18:51         ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-04 19:11         ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-04 19:11           ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-05  3:55           ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-05  3:55             ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-05  4:15             ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-05  4:15               ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-05 13:21               ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-05 13:21                 ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-05 21:53               ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-05 21:53                 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-05 15:17         ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-05 15:17           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-05 16:34           ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle
2009-08-05 16:34             ` Ramon de Carvalho Valle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090804143142.GA6712@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@novell.com \
    --cc=ramon@risesecurity.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.