From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Crane Cai <crane.cai-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: Add support for new AMD SMBus devices
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:38:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090805153814.70283b5a@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090720073112.GA18219@crane-desktop>
Hi Crane,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:31:12 +0800, Crane Cai wrote:
> Use driver to detect SMBus devices with Vendor ID AMD and class code is SMBus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Crane Cai <crane.cai-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
> index 0249a7d..034f388 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id piix4_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP300_SMBUS) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SMBUS) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS) },
> + /* AMD Generic, PCI class code and Vendor ID for SMBus */
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_ANY_ID),
> + .class = PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_SMBUS << 8,
> + .class_mask = 0xffffff },
Hmm, this seems a little too broad. In particular the AMD 8111 SMBus
2.0 device [1022:746a] would match, while we know it isn't compatible
with the Intel PIIX4 (it has its own driver: i2c-amd8111).
As much as I would like not having to add PCI IDs to the driver with
every new chipset released by AMD, this doesn't sound realistic in
practice, I fear. I suspect you will have to list devices individually,
just as we do for all other vendors.
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_OSB4) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS,
> @@ -499,9 +503,10 @@ static int __devinit piix4_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> {
> int retval;
>
> - if ((dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI) &&
> + if (((dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI) &&
> (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS) &&
> - (dev->revision >= 0x40))
> + (dev->revision >= 0x40)) ||
> + dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD)
> /* base address location etc changed in SB800 */
> retval = piix4_setup_sb800(dev, id);
> else
--
Jean Delvare
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Crane Cai <crane.cai@amd.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: Add support for new AMD SMBus devices
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:38:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090805153814.70283b5a@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090720073112.GA18219@crane-desktop>
Hi Crane,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:31:12 +0800, Crane Cai wrote:
> Use driver to detect SMBus devices with Vendor ID AMD and class code is SMBus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Crane Cai <crane.cai@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
> index 0249a7d..034f388 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
> @@ -479,6 +479,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id piix4_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP300_SMBUS) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_IXP400_SMBUS) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS) },
> + /* AMD Generic, PCI class code and Vendor ID for SMBus */
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_ANY_ID),
> + .class = PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_SMBUS << 8,
> + .class_mask = 0xffffff },
Hmm, this seems a little too broad. In particular the AMD 8111 SMBus
2.0 device [1022:746a] would match, while we know it isn't compatible
with the Intel PIIX4 (it has its own driver: i2c-amd8111).
As much as I would like not having to add PCI IDs to the driver with
every new chipset released by AMD, this doesn't sound realistic in
practice, I fear. I suspect you will have to list devices individually,
just as we do for all other vendors.
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS,
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_OSB4) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS,
> @@ -499,9 +503,10 @@ static int __devinit piix4_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> {
> int retval;
>
> - if ((dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI) &&
> + if (((dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI) &&
> (dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS) &&
> - (dev->revision >= 0x40))
> + (dev->revision >= 0x40)) ||
> + dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD)
> /* base address location etc changed in SB800 */
> retval = piix4_setup_sb800(dev, id);
> else
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-20 7:31 [PATCH] I2C: Add support for new AMD SMBus devices Crane Cai
2009-08-05 13:38 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-08-05 13:38 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090805153814.70283b5a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-06 0:59 ` Cai, Crane
2009-08-06 0:59 ` Cai, Crane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090805153814.70283b5a@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=crane.cai-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.