From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Allow delaying initialization of queue after allocation
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:25:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908081025.58865.knikanth@suse.de> (raw)
Export a way to delay initializing a request_queue after allocating it. This
is needed by device-mapper devices, as they create the queue on device
creation time, but they decide whether it would use the elevator and requests
only after first successful table load. Only request-based dm-devices use the
elevator and requests. Without this either one needs to initialize and free
the mempool and elevator, if it was a bio-based dm-device or leave it
allocated, as it is currently done.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
---
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 4b45435..5db0772 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_t gfp_mask, int node_id)
if (!q)
return NULL;
+ q->node = node_id;
+
q->backing_dev_info.unplug_io_fn = blk_backing_dev_unplug;
q->backing_dev_info.unplug_io_data = q;
q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages =
@@ -569,12 +571,25 @@ blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn, spinlock_t *lock, int node_id)
if (!q)
return NULL;
- q->node = node_id;
- if (blk_init_free_list(q)) {
+ if (blk_init_allocated_queue(q, rfn, lock)) {
+ blk_put_queue(q);
kmem_cache_free(blk_requestq_cachep, q);
return NULL;
}
+ return q;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_queue_node);
+
+int blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q, request_fn_proc *rfn,
+ spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+ err = blk_init_free_list(q);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
/*
* if caller didn't supply a lock, they get per-queue locking with
* our embedded lock
@@ -598,15 +613,20 @@ blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn, spinlock_t *lock, int node_id)
/*
* all done
*/
- if (!elevator_init(q, NULL)) {
- blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
- return q;
- }
+ err = elevator_init(q, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_and_out;
- blk_put_queue(q);
- return NULL;
+ blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
+
+ return 0;
+
+free_and_out:
+ mempool_destroy(q->rq.rq_pool);
+out:
+ return err;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_queue_node);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
int blk_get_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index e7cb5db..9552961 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -901,6 +901,8 @@ extern void blk_abort_queue(struct request_queue *);
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn,
spinlock_t *lock, int node_id);
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_queue(request_fn_proc *, spinlock_t *);
+extern int blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q,
+ request_fn_proc *rfn, spinlock_t *lock);
extern void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *);
extern void blk_queue_make_request(struct request_queue *, make_request_fn *);
extern void blk_queue_bounce_limit(struct request_queue *, u64);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Allow delaying initialization of queue after allocation
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:25:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908081025.58865.knikanth@suse.de> (raw)
Export a way to delay initializing a request_queue after allocating it. This
is needed by device-mapper devices, as they create the queue on device
creation time, but they decide whether it would use the elevator and requests
only after first successful table load. Only request-based dm-devices use the
elevator and requests. Without this either one needs to initialize and free
the mempool and elevator, if it was a bio-based dm-device or leave it
allocated, as it is currently done.
Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
---
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 4b45435..5db0772 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -495,6 +495,8 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_t gfp_mask, int node_id)
if (!q)
return NULL;
+ q->node = node_id;
+
q->backing_dev_info.unplug_io_fn = blk_backing_dev_unplug;
q->backing_dev_info.unplug_io_data = q;
q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages =
@@ -569,12 +571,25 @@ blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn, spinlock_t *lock, int node_id)
if (!q)
return NULL;
- q->node = node_id;
- if (blk_init_free_list(q)) {
+ if (blk_init_allocated_queue(q, rfn, lock)) {
+ blk_put_queue(q);
kmem_cache_free(blk_requestq_cachep, q);
return NULL;
}
+ return q;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_queue_node);
+
+int blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q, request_fn_proc *rfn,
+ spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+ err = blk_init_free_list(q);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
/*
* if caller didn't supply a lock, they get per-queue locking with
* our embedded lock
@@ -598,15 +613,20 @@ blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn, spinlock_t *lock, int node_id)
/*
* all done
*/
- if (!elevator_init(q, NULL)) {
- blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
- return q;
- }
+ err = elevator_init(q, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ goto free_and_out;
- blk_put_queue(q);
- return NULL;
+ blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
+
+ return 0;
+
+free_and_out:
+ mempool_destroy(q->rq.rq_pool);
+out:
+ return err;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_queue_node);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
int blk_get_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index e7cb5db..9552961 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -901,6 +901,8 @@ extern void blk_abort_queue(struct request_queue *);
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_queue_node(request_fn_proc *rfn,
spinlock_t *lock, int node_id);
extern struct request_queue *blk_init_queue(request_fn_proc *, spinlock_t *);
+extern int blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q,
+ request_fn_proc *rfn, spinlock_t *lock);
extern void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *);
extern void blk_queue_make_request(struct request_queue *, make_request_fn *);
extern void blk_queue_bounce_limit(struct request_queue *, u64);
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-08 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-08 4:55 Nikanth Karthikesan [this message]
2009-08-08 4:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] Allow delaying initialization of queue after allocation Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-08 15:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-08 15:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-08 16:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2009-08-10 10:21 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:21 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:48 ` [PATCH-v2 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-10 10:48 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 9:32 ` [PATCH-v3 " Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-08-11 9:32 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908081025.58865.knikanth@suse.de \
--to=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.