From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090810160949.GA21948@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > This looks good Eric.
> >
> > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota
> > enforcement too?
>
> I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do
> a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well.
Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090810160949.GA21948@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > This looks good Eric.
> >
> > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota
> > enforcement too?
>
> I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do
> a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well.
Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-10 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-07 19:10 [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity Eric Sandeen
2009-08-07 19:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-10 5:13 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-10 5:13 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-10 14:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-10 14:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-10 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-08-10 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-11 1:59 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-11 1:59 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-08-10 14:38 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] xfstests: split out xfs & generic quota existence tests Eric Sandeen
2009-08-10 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-10 14:40 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity Eric Sandeen
2009-08-10 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090810160949.GA21948@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmcilroy@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.