From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed-up pfifo_fast lookup using a bitmap
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:36:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090814213643.GA3179@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090814132458.27518.65144.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:54:58PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> ďťżHi Jarek,
>
> Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> wrote on 08/14/2009 04:31:27 PM:
>
> > Alas, private or public, these values are lower on average than
> > before, so I'm not sure the complexity (especially in reading) added
> > by this patch is worth it. So, I can only say it looks formally OK,
> > except the changelog and maybe 2 cosmetical suggestions below.
>
> Maybe the different test parameters result in smaller improvements.
> I agree with you - the first approach is very readable and probably
> preferable, while the second introduces a new structure and more
> complexity.
Actually, I meant the complexity added by any of these versions. If
you declare: "This helps in faster lookup for a skb when there are no
high priority skbs.", there is a question if less than 1% is enough.
> I am sending both these versions a last time, after fixing your
> comments in case someone can help decide if one or the other is
> better (sorry I forgot to run checkpatch couple of times, will try
> to remember next time).
I definitely can't see a reason to make this variable public, and
prefer the private (v2) version (which still lacks a changelog, btw).
Thanks,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-14 13:24 [PATCH] Speed-up pfifo_fast lookup using a bitmap Krishna Kumar
2009-08-14 13:25 ` [PATCH v1] Speed-up pfifo_fast lookup using a public bitmap Krishna Kumar
2009-08-14 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] Speed-up pfifo_fast lookup using a private bitmap Krishna Kumar
2009-08-14 21:36 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-08-18 2:03 ` [PATCH] Speed-up pfifo_fast lookup using a bitmap David Miller
2009-08-18 16:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-14 8:19 Krishna Kumar
2009-08-14 11:01 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-13 7:28 Krishna Kumar
2009-08-13 10:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-08-13 10:41 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-08-13 11:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090814213643.GA3179@ami.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.