All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>,
	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:21:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090818102136.GN29655@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A8A7D38.5020201@gmail.com>

Marco,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:06:48PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Yeah, I agree, do you really need udevd, device file creation at every
> start-up in /dev? Usually static devices nodes and mdev for hotplug are
> enough or at least you could use a simple script to create only once
> time the devices file (mdev -s). About the fs, do you really need a
> rootfs with ubifs? I mean, you could "split" your fs. You could use a
> read-only fs (SquashFS for example) for your root-fs, ubifs for
> permanent storage data (mounted under /data for example) and a ram fs
> for volatile data.

Well, we try to find out what is possible with a fast booting Linux
system which *still* is as "vanilla" as possible.

All the "boot-in-one-second" systems out there are highly squeezed,
which is surely good if you have a scenario with high production
volumes. You can do the optimization in the last steps then and it
doesn't really matter how much time you spend with testing to come from
a system that works for a developer to a production system.

For most of our use cases here at Pengutronix, we see that:

- Customers want in-system upgradability on a per-packet base; so the
  flash filesystems should be normally r/o, but may be remounted r/w.

- Development systems should be close to production systems, in order to
  be able to have more "early testing"; so things like printk-ripout or
  special non-mainline patches/tweaks should be avoided as far as
  possible.

- In general we want to have our systems close to what the mainline
  does; Automation & Embedded is only a small market, and anything
  which is *not* specific to these markets but mainline is good.

So let's see what we'll reach while trying what people have suggested.

Thanks,
rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 17:02 New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:19 ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-14 18:46   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 18:58     ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:57   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:01     ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-14 21:15       ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:35       ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-15  6:21         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-14 20:04 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-14 20:43   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-15  5:59     ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-15 10:35     ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-18 10:06       ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 10:21         ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2009-08-18 10:34           ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:44             ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:48               ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:53                 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-09-04 16:16       ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-09 14:33         ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-09-10  0:03           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-17 19:15     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-17 22:35       ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot (was Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM) Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:03         ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot David Miller
2009-08-18  1:24           ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:27             ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:40               ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:56                 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 11:57                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-18  5:00                 ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:31           ` Rick Jones
2009-08-18  2:45             ` david
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Willy Tarreau
2009-08-15  6:14   ` New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-18 14:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-18 15:31   ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-18 16:34     ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 18:23     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-19  7:21     ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-19 16:20       ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-20  8:57         ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090818102136.GN29655@pengutronix.de \
    --to=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=js@sig21.net \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.