All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: r.schwebel@pengutronix.de, vda.linux@googlemail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org,
	arjan@linux.intel.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new ipdelay= option for faster netboot
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:24:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8A02CA.7040305@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090817.180323.253692704.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:35:01 -0700
> 
>> Tim Bird wrote:
>>> See the definitions of CONF_PRE_OPEN and CON_POST_OPEN
>>> in net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
>>>
>>> They are set to ridiculously long values.  In my experience,
>>> you can cut them down considerably with no dangerous side
>>> effects (but I haven't asked the network guys about the
>>> possible downsides).
>> It turns out that others have seen this delay.  Simon
>> Arlott recently posted a patch to make the delay avoidable
>> at boot time from the kernel command line.
>>
>> See http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/31678/
> 
> "Rediculiously long" is a relative term.
No offense intended.  I could have phrased this
better.  The delays were a few orders of
magnitude longer than apparently needed, on my
embedded test systems with ethernet.  I didn't
try eliminating them completely, as in the Arlott patch.

1.5 seconds is a long time for me.  My bootup time budget for
the kernel ranges from 0.5 to 3.0 seconds, depending on the
product.

> I have card/switch combinations that take up to 10 seconds to
> negotiate a proper link.

What types of delays are these timeouts supposed to
cover?  Networking delays or hardware bring-up delays?
(Or both)?  If for networking delays, is this for all
types of networks, or just some (e.g. ones that create
virtual circuits)?

I'm trying to get a sense for whether the card/switch
combinations that would take this long would be encountered
in the types of embedded devices I code for.  (TVs, camcorders,
etc.)

>
> So what's there now is actually a quite agressive setting.
> 
> And BTW, discussions about stuff like this belong on
> netdev@vger.kernel.org, which has been added to the CC:

I was going to wait to see if this solved Robert's
problem, before widening the discussion.  But I'm happy
to find out more about these delays now.

Thanks,
 -- Tim

=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 17:02 New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:19 ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-14 18:46   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-14 18:58     ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 18:57   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:01     ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-14 21:15       ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-14 21:35       ` Zan Lynx
2009-08-15  6:21         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-14 20:04 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-14 20:43   ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-15  5:59     ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-15 10:35     ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-08-18 10:06       ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 10:21         ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:34           ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:44             ` Robert Schwebel
2009-08-18 10:48               ` Alex Riesen
2009-08-18 10:53                 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-09-04 16:16       ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-09 14:33         ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-09-10  0:03           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-17 19:15     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-17 22:35       ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot (was Re: New fast(?)-boot results on ARM) Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:03         ` new ipdelay= option for faster netboot David Miller
2009-08-18  1:24           ` Tim Bird [this message]
2009-08-18  1:27             ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:40               ` Tim Bird
2009-08-18  1:56                 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 11:57                 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-08-18  5:00                 ` David Miller
2009-08-18  1:31           ` Rick Jones
2009-08-18  2:45             ` david
2009-08-18  4:56               ` Willy Tarreau
2009-08-15  6:14   ` New fast(?)-boot results on ARM Artem Bityutskiy
2009-08-18 14:06 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-18 15:31   ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-18 16:34     ` Marco Stornelli
2009-08-18 18:23     ` Tim Bird
2009-08-19  7:21     ` Sascha Hauer
2009-08-19 16:20       ` Dirk Behme
2009-08-20  8:57         ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8A02CA.7040305@am.sony.com \
    --to=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.