From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: learning curve (aka Git User's Survey 2009 partial summary, part 2 - from first 10)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:55:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090818195550.GB12938@vidovic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908181900.03356.jnareb@gmail.com>
The 18/08/09, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > I believe it would be interesting to know who (from the question 6.)
> > think what later. We may expect that people of the grade 4 and 5 ("can
> > offer advice" and "know it very well") underestimate the difficulty to
> > learn Git.
>
> Well, you can do some analysis yourself, using just created filters at
> http://www.survs.com/shareResults?survey=2PIMZGU0&rndm=678J66QRA2
Thank you very much.
> For example:
>
> ================================================|
> | proficiency with Git |
> To learn |-----------------------------|
> | any*[%] | 1-3 [%] | 4-5 [%] |
> ------------------------------------------------|
> Very easy | 4% | 3% | 5% |
> Easy | 20% | 19% | 22% |
> Reasonably easy | 55% | 55% | 56% |
> Hard | 19% | 20% | 16% |
> Very hard | 2% | 3% | 1% |
> ------------------------------------------------|
> Total respondents | 3005 | 1786 | 1212 |
> ================================================|
This looks consistent. Here are some more grained summaries based on
your filters:
=========================================================
| TO LEARN (%) |
===============================================================================
Proficiency | very easy | easy | reasonably easy | hard | very hard |
===============================================================================
no filter (any) | 4 | 20 | 55 | 19 | 2 |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――|
1. novice | 3 | 12 | 49 | 25 | 11 |
2. casual | 2 | 17 | 54 | 25 | 3 |
3. everyday use | 4 | 21 | 56 | 18 | 2 |
4. can offer advice | 4 | 23 | 56 | 17 | 1 |
5. know it very well | 11 | 20 | 54 | 14 | 1 |
===============================================================================
=========================================================
| TO USE (%) |
===============================================================================
Proficiency | very easy | easy | reasonably easy | hard | very hard |
===============================================================================
no filter (any) | 9 | 37 | 45 | 8 | 1 |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――――――――|――――――|―――――――――――|
1. novice | 5 | 17 | 47 | 25 | 7 |
2. casual | 5 | 27 | 51 | 15 | 2 |
3. everyday use | 8 | 36 | 47 | 8 | 1 |
4. can offer advice | 11 | 44 | 40 | 4 | 0 |
5. know it very well | 22 | 37 | 36 | 5 | 1 |
===============================================================================
What appears here first is that the averages of the third category
("everyday day use") are _very_ near from the averages of the whole users.
This gives a good confidence in the results.
Simplified summary:
===============================================
| TO LEARN (%) |
=====================================================================
Proficiency | (very) easy | reasonably easy | (very) hard |
=====================================================================
no filter (any) | 24 | 55 | 21 |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|―――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|
1. novice | 15 | 49 | 36 |
2. casual | 19 | 54 | 28 |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
3. everyday use | 25 | 56 | 20 |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
4. can offer advice | 27 | 56 | 18 |
5. know it very well | 31 | 54 | 15 |
=====================================================================
===============================================
| TO USE (%) |
=====================================================================
Proficiency | (very) easy | reasonably easy | (very) hard |
=====================================================================
no filter (any) | 36 | 45 | 9 |
――――――――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|―――――――――――――――――|―――――――――――――|
1. novice | 22 | 47 | 32 |
2. casual | 32 | 51 | 17 |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
3. everyday use | 44 | 47 | 9 |
----------------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
4. can offer advice | 55 | 40 | 4 |
5. know it very well | 59 | 36 | 6 |
=====================================================================
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-18 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 10:24 Git User's Survey 2009 partial summary, part 2 - from first 10 Jakub Narebski
2009-08-17 10:44 ` Johan Herland
2009-08-17 21:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-08-18 15:54 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2009-08-18 17:00 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-08-18 19:55 ` Nicolas Sebrecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090818195550.GB12938@vidovic \
--to=nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.