From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: pgynther@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibm_newemac: emac_close() needs to call netif_carrier_off()
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:20:58 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090820.022058.160961745.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250748142.10937.4.camel@pasglop>
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:02:22 +1000
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:32 -0700, Petri Gynther wrote:
>> Stephen,
>>
>> I think your suggestion of adding netif_running() check to
>> bond_check_dev_link() is valid and a good fix to the bonding driver.
>> We can do this in a separate patch.
>>
>> However, I think that the change to ibm_newemac: emac_close() is
>> needed as well. ibm_newemac netdevs should not return
>> netif_carrier_ok() == TRUE when they have been shut down.
>
> Well, we definitely don't do that in sungem either, since we continue
> the link polling while the interface is down... IE. interface up/down is
> the data path and is orthogonal to the PHY polling in sungem. I suppose
> we -could- stop the polling while the interface is down, though I think
> my initial implementation did only poll the link while the interface was
> up and that was causing endless problems with various laptop-net style
> tools (however that was years and years ago).
It just shows how few people use sungem with bonding :-)
Short term I'm going to add the ibm_newemac change.
Longer term we should probably add the netif_running() check to
bond_check_dev_link().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-20 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-19 21:00 [PATCH] ibm_newemac: emac_close() needs to call netif_carrier_off() Petri Gynther
2009-08-19 21:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-19 21:34 ` David Miller
2009-08-19 21:40 ` Petri Gynther
2009-08-19 22:32 ` Petri Gynther
2009-08-19 23:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-08-20 6:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-20 9:20 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-08-20 9:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090820.022058.160961745.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgynther@google.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.