From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <Chuck.Lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Tom Haynes <Thomas.Haynes-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: mount.nfs: access denied by server
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:24:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090821182418.GE21043@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAE89B4F-CA8C-46B2-82EA-9BAA438C1DF7@oracle.com>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 02:16:08PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> I want to understand the server bug a little more. I glanced over RFC
> 2623 and didn't see anything specific.
>
> Is it the case that only Linux NFSD does this, or do other servers do
> it? In other words, is this a typical server response, and if so, is
> there a specific semantic attached to it?
>
> If no list is provided, should the client assume that only AUTH_NONE and
> AUTH_SYS are supported, or instead, perhaps that the client can try to
> use any flavor? In other words, if no list is provided, let the mount
> proceed no matter what was specified by sec= ?
I think the safest behavior on the client would be something like:
- If an explicit sec= is provided on the client, try that
flavor. Otherwise:
- If the server returned a nonempty list, pick something
off that list. Otherwise:
- Try auth_sys.
--b.
>
> Thanks for any clarification.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
>> Date: August 20, 2009 10:36:11 PM GMT-04:00
>> To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, "Mr. Charles Edward Lever"
>> <Chuck.Lever@oracle.com>
>> Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, LKML
>> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Subject: Re: mount.nfs: access denied by server
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:27 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:02:29PM +0800, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> After upgrading NFS client kernel to latest linux-next, NFS mount
>>>>> failed:
>>>>>
>>>>> # mount -t nfs pxe:/cc /cc
>>>>> mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting pxe:/cc
>>>>>
>>>>> # uname -a
>>>>> Linux hp 2.6.31-rc6-next-20090818 #61 SMP Thu Aug 20
>>>>> 14:46:10 CST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>
>>>>> However server log says OK:
>>>>>
>>>>> Aug 20 15:02:09 wu-t61 mountd[4599]: authenticated mount
>>>>> request from 192.168.11.6:973 for /cc (/cc)
>>>>> Aug 20 15:02:09 wu-t61 mountd[4599]: authenticated unmount
>>>>> request from 192.168.11.6:974 for /cc (/cc)
>>>>>
>>>>> However-2: nfsroot can be mounted at boot time. Server kernel has
>>>>> always been 2.6.30.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Fengguang
>>>>
>>>> Can you try again after enabling mount debugging on the NFS client?
>>>>
>>>> echo 512 > /proc/sys/sunrpc/nfs_debug
>>>
>>> I used 1024 and found the mount failed here in nfs_walk_authlist():
>>>
>>> dfprintk(MOUNT, "NFS: server does not support requested auth
>>> flavor\ n");
>>> nfs_umount(request);
>>
>> Thanks Fengguang!
>>
>> Chuck, this looks like one of yours. Could it be that you are hitting
>> the same Linux knfsd bug that Tom Haynes saw with a Solaris client?
>> AFAICR, the problem was that existing nfs servers do not set a default
>> auth flavour, and so you just have to try with auth_sys and see if it
>> succeeds...
>>
>> Cheers
>> Trond
>>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 7:13 mount.nfs: access denied by server Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 7:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-20 13:02 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1250773349.5352.23.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 1:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 1:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 2:36 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1250822171.6514.29.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 17:50 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 17:50 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-22 1:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-21 18:16 ` Fwd: " Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 18:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-21 20:20 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-24 12:15 ` Fwd: " Steve Dickson
2009-08-21 18:24 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-08-21 18:46 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 20:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-21 20:18 ` Tom Haynes
[not found] ` <4A8F0118.60705-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 20:39 ` Peter Staubach
2009-08-21 20:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-21 21:08 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1250888892.5700.7.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 21:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-21 20:36 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 21:15 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1250889345.5700.11.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 21:21 ` Tom Haynes
[not found] ` <4A8F0FCC.2080709-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 21:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-08-21 21:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-21 21:40 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1250890836.5700.19.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 21:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-21 21:51 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1250891463.5700.21.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-24 16:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-24 16:22 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-24 17:06 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251133618.6325.262.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-24 17:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-25 15:36 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-25 16:49 ` Tom Haynes
[not found] ` <4A94162C.20904-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 16:58 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251219492.25372.3.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 18:17 ` Tom Haynes
[not found] ` <4A942ACF.4030502-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 18:39 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251225543.25372.22.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 18:43 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251225797.25372.25.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 22:17 ` Tom Haynes
[not found] ` <4A9462E4.5020404-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 23:20 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251242416.5403.3.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 23:37 ` [nfs-discuss] " Nicolas Williams
[not found] ` <20090825233758.GZ1033-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 0:21 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1251246105.5403.12.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 21:03 ` Nicolas Williams
2009-08-25 17:40 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-25 18:02 ` Tom Haynes
2009-08-25 18:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-25 19:05 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 22:21 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 21:41 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 19:07 ` Thomas Haynes
[not found] ` <760BE185-BE57-42C2-817C-6776B5B66667-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 19:22 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 19:40 ` Tom Haynes
[not found] ` <4A8EF847.8030500-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-21 20:04 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-21 20:41 ` Peter Staubach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090821182418.GE21043@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Chuck.Lever@oracle.com \
--cc=Thomas.Haynes-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.