From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutils andconsolidate linker script
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:14:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825141405.GA14879@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A940AE502000078000119C5@vpn.id2.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 15:56 >>>
> >* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry for having forgotten to do so before submitting the first
> >> time (I know I had intended to).
> >
> >This happens. I'm still unsure whether we can do it in .31.0 or need
> >to delay it to .31.1 via a -stable backport tag. One more problem
> >with it and i think we'll need to delay it - it's just too large and
> >changes too many aspects of the linker script.
> >
> >Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and
> >'clean up' portions?
>
> Besides being cumbersome, that would make it even larger, so I'd
> say that's not worth it.
I mean the two patches yield the same end result. The first one
(which is smaller, hopefully) gets committed to x86/urgent, the
second one (the cleanups and other non-essentials) gets pushed
upstream in .32.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 15:51 [PATCH] x86: fix build with older binutils and consolidate linker script Jan Beulich
2009-08-21 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 6:55 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-24 7:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 7:21 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-24 16:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 22:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:01 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 13:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 14:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutils andconsolidate " Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-08-25 14:35 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutilsandconsolidate " Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 14:48 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090825141405.GA14879@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.