From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutilsandconsolidate linker script
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:48:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090825144816.GA28026@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9412DE0200007800011A07@vpn.id2.novell.com>
* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 16:14 >>>
> >
> >* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 25.08.09 15:56 >>>
> >> >Would it be possible to split it into two pieces: 'minimal fix' and
> >> >'clean up' portions?
> >>
> >> Besides being cumbersome, that would make it even larger, so I'd
> >> say that's not worth it.
> >
> >I mean the two patches yield the same end result. The first one
>
> I also understood it that way.
>
> >(which is smaller, hopefully) gets committed to x86/urgent, the
> >second one (the cleanups and other non-essentials) gets pushed
> >upstream in .32.
>
> The cleanup part really isn't much more than what I described with
> "Once touching this code, also use the various data section helper
> macros from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.", and if the first
> patch wouldn't use those macros, it would just grow and become
> even less readable.
fair enough. Lets hope it all goes fine.
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 15:51 [PATCH] x86: fix build with older binutils and consolidate linker script Jan Beulich
2009-08-21 20:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 6:55 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-24 7:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 7:21 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-24 16:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-24 22:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix " tip-bot for Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:01 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 13:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 14:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutils andconsolidate " Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 14:35 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Fix build with older binutilsandconsolidate " Jan Beulich
2009-08-25 14:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090825144816.GA28026@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.