From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 loop(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:27:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090826212732.GA18124@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908261717001.1594@p34.internal.lan>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 05:19:11PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> For the root filesystem, on / type xfs (rw,noatime)
> For larger partitions (per the cryptoloop doc) the partition itself is
> setup via cryptoloop and then XFS ontop of that. Nothing special.
Just to make sure we have all data here - you see the problem only
with loop devices backed by XFS, only with loop devices backed by
raw partitions or with both?
>> Any way to trgiger it with just loop but not crypto, etc.
> Unfortunately not that I am aware of.. Would trying the kernel with the
> patch removed and mounted with -o nobarrier help to show us anything, or?
Actually, yes - seeing what happens if you run plain 2.6.30 or 2.6.31-rc
without the backout patch, but with -o nobarrier would be very
interesting.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 loop(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6)
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:27:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090826212732.GA18124@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908261717001.1594@p34.internal.lan>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 05:19:11PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> For the root filesystem, on / type xfs (rw,noatime)
> For larger partitions (per the cryptoloop doc) the partition itself is
> setup via cryptoloop and then XFS ontop of that. Nothing special.
Just to make sure we have all data here - you see the problem only
with loop devices backed by XFS, only with loop devices backed by
raw partitions or with both?
>> Any way to trgiger it with just loop but not crypto, etc.
> Unfortunately not that I am aware of.. Would trying the kernel with the
> patch removed and mounted with -o nobarrier help to show us anything, or?
Actually, yes - seeing what happens if you run plain 2.6.30 or 2.6.31-rc
without the backout patch, but with -o nobarrier would be very
interesting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-08 8:39 Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression Justin Piszcz
2009-08-08 8:39 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-08 19:31 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-08 19:31 ` Felix Blyakher
2009-08-09 10:09 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-09 10:09 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-11 10:58 ` Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (happened again) Justin Piszcz
2009-08-11 10:58 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-16 2:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-16 2:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-17 14:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-17 14:25 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 10:27 ` Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6) Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 10:27 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-22 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-22 14:45 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 14:45 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 20:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-22 20:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-22 20:46 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 20:46 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 20:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-22 20:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-22 21:01 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-22 21:01 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-23 22:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-23 22:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-24 11:04 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-24 11:04 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-26 13:50 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-26 13:50 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-26 18:02 ` Kernel 2.6.30.4 loop(..?) " Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-26 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-26 21:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-26 21:19 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-26 21:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-08-26 21:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-26 21:31 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-26 21:31 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-28 11:23 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-28 11:23 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-08-28 16:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-28 16:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 11:45 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-09-02 11:45 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090826212732.GA18124@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.