From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: stuyoder@gmail.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Clock binding
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:23:20 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828.122320.2072670641.imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9138@mail.gmail.com>
In message: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9138@mail.gmail.co=
m>
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com> writes:
: > Lets *not* do it on power.org. =A0I'd like to see the bindings used=
by
: > more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of =
a
: > mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. =A0kernel.org would be a good=
: > host. =A0So would ozlabs or infradead. =A0Or I'd be happy to mainta=
in one
: > on secretlab.
: =
: I think broadening it beyond power.org is good. Along those lines I'=
d prefer
: not having this on kernel.org, as device trees are not Linux-centric.=
There
: are other OS vendors I've interacted with that I'd like to see use de=
vice trees
: and separating it from Linux may be better IMO.
I know of at least one other free OS that will be migrating to device
trees for enumeration of devices in the embedded space...
Warner
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: stuyoder@gmail.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Clock binding
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:23:20 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828.122320.2072670641.imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9138@mail.gmail.com>
In message: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9138@mail.gmail.com>
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com> writes:
: > Lets *not* do it on power.org. I'd like to see the bindings used by
: > more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of a
: > mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. kernel.org would be a good
: > host. So would ozlabs or infradead. Or I'd be happy to maintain one
: > on secretlab.
:
: I think broadening it beyond power.org is good. Along those lines I'd prefer
: not having this on kernel.org, as device trees are not Linux-centric. There
: are other OS vendors I've interacted with that I'd like to see use device trees
: and separating it from Linux may be better IMO.
I know of at least one other free OS that will be migrating to device
trees for enumeration of devices in the embedded space...
Warner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-18 4:21 [RFC] Clock binding Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-18 4:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-18 7:45 ` [RFC/PATCH] Clock binding prototype implementation Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-18 7:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-27 4:09 ` [RFC] Clock binding Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-27 4:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-27 5:20 ` Grant Likely
2009-08-27 21:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-27 21:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-27 22:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-27 22:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-27 22:28 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-27 22:28 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-27 22:45 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-27 22:45 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-28 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 2:36 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-28 2:36 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-28 2:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 2:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 2:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-28 2:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-28 10:58 ` Josh Boyer
2009-08-28 11:23 ` David Gibson
2009-08-28 11:23 ` David Gibson
2009-08-28 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 12:16 ` Stuart Yoder
2009-08-28 12:16 ` Stuart Yoder
2009-08-28 16:06 ` Grant Likely
2009-08-28 16:06 ` Grant Likely
2009-08-28 18:05 ` Stuart Yoder
2009-08-28 18:05 ` Stuart Yoder
2009-08-28 18:23 ` M. Warner Losh [this message]
2009-08-28 18:23 ` M. Warner Losh
2009-08-28 20:09 ` Grant Likely
2009-08-28 20:09 ` Grant Likely
2009-08-31 17:49 ` Stuart Yoder
2009-08-31 17:49 ` Stuart Yoder
2009-08-28 18:12 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-28 18:12 ` Mitch Bradley
2009-08-28 18:24 ` Rafal Jaworowski
2009-08-28 22:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 22:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-08-28 16:37 ` Grant Likely
2009-08-28 16:37 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090828.122320.2072670641.imp@bsdimp.com \
--to=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=stuyoder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.