All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: ankita@in.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] Fix fake numa on ppc
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:33:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901050316.GA4076@in.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello,

Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:

1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
different real nodes.

2) The cpu association is broken. On a JS22 blade for example, which is
a 2-node numa machine, I get the following:

# cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/sda6  numa=fake=2G,4G,,6G,8G,10G,12G,14G,16G
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
0-3
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpulist
4-7
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node4/cpulist

#

So, though the cpus 4-7 should have been associated with node4, they
still belong to node1. The patch works by recording a real numa node
boundary and incrementing the fake node count. At the same time, a
mapping is stored from the real numa node to the first fake node that
gets created on it.

Any suggestions on improving the patch are most welcome!

Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>

Index: linux-2.6.31-rc5/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc5.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc5/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
 #include <asm/smp.h>
 
 static int numa_enabled = 1;
+static int fake_enabled = 1;
+
+/* The array maps a real numa node to the first fake node that gets
+created on it */
+int fake_numa_node_mapping[MAX_NUMNODES];
 
 static char *cmdline __initdata;
 
@@ -49,14 +54,24 @@ static int __cpuinit fake_numa_create_ne
 	unsigned long long mem;
 	char *p = cmdline;
 	static unsigned int fake_nid;
+	static unsigned int orig_nid = 0;
 	static unsigned long long curr_boundary;
 
 	/*
 	 * Modify node id, iff we started creating NUMA nodes
 	 * We want to continue from where we left of the last time
 	 */
-	if (fake_nid)
+	if (fake_nid) {
+		if (orig_nid != *nid) {
+			fake_nid++;
+			fake_numa_node_mapping[*nid] = fake_nid;
+			orig_nid = *nid;
+			*nid = fake_nid;
+			return 0;
+		}
 		*nid = fake_nid;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * In case there are no more arguments to parse, the
 	 * node_id should be the same as the last fake node id
@@ -440,7 +455,7 @@ static int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struc
  */
 static int __cpuinit numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu)
 {
-	int nid = 0;
+	int nid = 0, new_nid;
 	struct device_node *cpu = of_get_cpu_node(lcpu, NULL);
 
 	if (!cpu) {
@@ -450,8 +465,15 @@ static int __cpuinit numa_setup_cpu(unsi
 
 	nid = of_node_to_nid_single(cpu);
 
+	if (fake_enabled && nid) {
+		new_nid = fake_numa_node_mapping[nid];
+		if (new_nid > 0)
+			nid = new_nid;
+	}
+
 	if (nid < 0 || !node_online(nid))
 		nid = any_online_node(NODE_MASK_ALL);
+
 out:
 	map_cpu_to_node(lcpu, nid);
 
@@ -1005,8 +1027,11 @@ static int __init early_numa(char *p)
 		numa_debug = 1;
 
 	p = strstr(p, "fake=");
-	if (p)
+	if (p) {
 		cmdline = p + strlen("fake=");
+		if (numa_enabled)
+			fake_enabled = 1;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }

-- 
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs, 
Bangalore, India   

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, ankita@in.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] Fix fake numa on ppc
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:33:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901050316.GA4076@in.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello,

Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:

1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
different real nodes.

2) The cpu association is broken. On a JS22 blade for example, which is
a 2-node numa machine, I get the following:

# cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/sda6  numa=fake=2G,4G,,6G,8G,10G,12G,14G,16G
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
0-3
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node1/cpulist
4-7
# cat /sys/devices/system/node/node4/cpulist

#

So, though the cpus 4-7 should have been associated with node4, they
still belong to node1. The patch works by recording a real numa node
boundary and incrementing the fake node count. At the same time, a
mapping is stored from the real numa node to the first fake node that
gets created on it.

Any suggestions on improving the patch are most welcome!

Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>

Index: linux-2.6.31-rc5/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31-rc5.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ linux-2.6.31-rc5/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
 #include <asm/smp.h>
 
 static int numa_enabled = 1;
+static int fake_enabled = 1;
+
+/* The array maps a real numa node to the first fake node that gets
+created on it */
+int fake_numa_node_mapping[MAX_NUMNODES];
 
 static char *cmdline __initdata;
 
@@ -49,14 +54,24 @@ static int __cpuinit fake_numa_create_ne
 	unsigned long long mem;
 	char *p = cmdline;
 	static unsigned int fake_nid;
+	static unsigned int orig_nid = 0;
 	static unsigned long long curr_boundary;
 
 	/*
 	 * Modify node id, iff we started creating NUMA nodes
 	 * We want to continue from where we left of the last time
 	 */
-	if (fake_nid)
+	if (fake_nid) {
+		if (orig_nid != *nid) {
+			fake_nid++;
+			fake_numa_node_mapping[*nid] = fake_nid;
+			orig_nid = *nid;
+			*nid = fake_nid;
+			return 0;
+		}
 		*nid = fake_nid;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * In case there are no more arguments to parse, the
 	 * node_id should be the same as the last fake node id
@@ -440,7 +455,7 @@ static int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struc
  */
 static int __cpuinit numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu)
 {
-	int nid = 0;
+	int nid = 0, new_nid;
 	struct device_node *cpu = of_get_cpu_node(lcpu, NULL);
 
 	if (!cpu) {
@@ -450,8 +465,15 @@ static int __cpuinit numa_setup_cpu(unsi
 
 	nid = of_node_to_nid_single(cpu);
 
+	if (fake_enabled && nid) {
+		new_nid = fake_numa_node_mapping[nid];
+		if (new_nid > 0)
+			nid = new_nid;
+	}
+
 	if (nid < 0 || !node_online(nid))
 		nid = any_online_node(NODE_MASK_ALL);
+
 out:
 	map_cpu_to_node(lcpu, nid);
 
@@ -1005,8 +1027,11 @@ static int __init early_numa(char *p)
 		numa_debug = 1;
 
 	p = strstr(p, "fake=");
-	if (p)
+	if (p) {
 		cmdline = p + strlen("fake=");
+		if (numa_enabled)
+			fake_enabled = 1;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }

-- 
Regards,
Ankita Garg (ankita@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM India Systems & Technology Labs, 
Bangalore, India   

             reply	other threads:[~2009-09-01  5:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-01  5:03 Ankita Garg [this message]
2009-09-01  5:03 ` [PATCH] Fix fake numa on ppc Ankita Garg
2009-09-01  5:57 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-01  5:57   ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-01  9:24   ` Ankita Garg
2009-09-01  9:24     ` Ankita Garg
2009-09-01 14:27     ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-02  5:36       ` Ankita Garg
2009-09-02  5:53         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-02  5:53           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-02  6:03           ` David Rientjes
2009-09-02  6:03             ` David Rientjes
2009-09-02  8:51             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-02  8:51               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-02  5:58         ` David Rientjes
2009-09-02  5:58           ` David Rientjes
2009-09-02  5:52       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-02  5:52         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090901050316.GA4076@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ankita@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.