From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: page allocator regression on nommu
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:20:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901102042.GA15680@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901100356.GA27393@csn.ul.ie>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:03:56AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:46:27AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > What is the output of the following debug patch?
> > >
> >
> > ...
> > Inode-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Badness at mm/page_alloc.c:1046
> >
>
> Ok, it looks like ownership was not being taken properly and the first
> patch was incomplete. Please try
>
That did the trick, everything looks back to normal now. :-)
Tested-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: page allocator regression on nommu
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:20:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901102042.GA15680@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901100356.GA27393@csn.ul.ie>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:03:56AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:46:27AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > What is the output of the following debug patch?
> > >
> >
> > ...
> > Inode-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > Badness at mm/page_alloc.c:1046
> >
>
> Ok, it looks like ownership was not being taken properly and the first
> patch was incomplete. Please try
>
That did the trick, everything looks back to normal now. :-)
Tested-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 7:48 page allocator regression on nommu Paul Mundt
2009-08-31 7:48 ` Paul Mundt
2009-08-31 10:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-31 10:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-31 10:26 ` Paul Mundt
2009-08-31 10:26 ` Paul Mundt
2009-09-01 13:46 ` David Howells
2009-09-01 13:46 ` David Howells
2009-09-01 13:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-01 13:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-01 14:27 ` Paul Mundt
2009-09-01 14:27 ` Paul Mundt
2009-09-01 13:35 ` David Howells
2009-09-01 13:35 ` David Howells
2009-08-31 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-31 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-31 10:43 ` Paul Mundt
2009-08-31 10:43 ` Paul Mundt
2009-08-31 10:59 ` Mel Gorman
2009-08-31 10:59 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 0:46 ` Paul Mundt
2009-09-01 0:46 ` Paul Mundt
2009-09-01 10:03 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 10:03 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-01 10:20 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-09-01 10:20 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090901102042.GA15680@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.