From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block: add enable_write_cache flag
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:14:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090902141444.GA18253@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9E6F90.8060609@codemonkey.ws>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:13:52AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Does barrier=0 make a performance difference? IOW, would the typical
> default ext3 deployment show worse behavior?
I'll give it a spin.
> >A kernel defconfig compile takes between 9m40s and 9m42s with
> >data=writeback and barrieres disabled, and with fdatasync barriers
> >enabled it actually is minimally faster,
>
> If fdatasync different than fsync on ext3? Does it result in a full
> metadata commit?
ext3 honors the fdatasync flag and only does it's horrible job if the
metadata we care about is dirty, that is only if some non-timestamp
data is dirty. Which means for a non-sparse image file it does
well, while for a sparse image file needing allocations it will
cause trouble. And now that you mention it I've only tested the
non-sparse case which now is default for the management tools at
least on Fedora.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-02 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 20:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] data integrity fixes Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 20:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block: add enable_write_cache flag Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 22:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 22:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 22:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 23:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-01 10:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 22:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-31 22:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 22:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 22:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 23:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 23:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 3:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 13:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-02 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-09-02 19:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 20:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: use fdatasync instead of fsync Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 21:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 21:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 22:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-31 22:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-01 15:59 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-01 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 0:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-02 0:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-02 1:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-02 14:02 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-02 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 20:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] block: add bdrv_aio_flush operation Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-01 10:24 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-01 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-31 20:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] virtio-blk: add volatile writecache feature Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090902141444.GA18253@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.