From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: EXT4: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1721!
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:50:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903112003.GA13105@skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9F7B48.9010903@in.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:46:08PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> While executing FS resize test against ext4 on a 4-way
> POWER6 box with 2.6.31-rc8 kernel ran into following bug.
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> cpu 0x2: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c0000000f963ece0]
> pc: c000000000264d80: .ext4_mb_good_group+0x54/0x15c
> lr: c00000000026c9b0: .ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x278/0x44c
> sp: c0000000f963ef60
> msr: 8000000000029032
> current = 0xc000000047b635a0
> paca = 0xc000000000b62a00
> pid = 32202, comm = dd
> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1721!
> enter ? for help
> [link register ] c00000000026c9b0 .ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x278/0x44c
> [c0000000f963ef60] c00000000026c99c .ext4_mb_regular_allocator+0x264/0x44c
> (unreliable)
> [c0000000f963f090] c00000000026cde0 .ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x25c/0x5b0
> [c0000000f963f170] c000000000263260 .ext4_ext_get_blocks+0xd18/0xf2c
> [c0000000f963f2f0] c0000000002404a8 .ext4_get_blocks+0x1b8/0x438
> [c0000000f963f3c0] c000000000241d8c .ext4_get_block+0xe8/0x15c
> [c0000000f963f480] c00000000018e1c0 .__block_prepare_write+0x210/0x4b0
> [c0000000f963f5c0] c00000000018e698 .block_write_begin+0xa8/0x13c
> [c0000000f963f680] c000000000243be4 .ext4_write_begin+0x198/0x324
> [c0000000f963f790] c000000000112e50 .generic_file_buffered_write+0x140/0x37c
> [c0000000f963f8d0] c00000000011364c
> .__generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x37c/0x3e0
> [c0000000f963f9d0] c0000000001140e0 .generic_file_aio_write+0x88/0x120
> [c0000000f963fa90] c000000000239250 .ext4_file_write+0xe4/0x1a4
> [c0000000f963fb40] c00000000015e1f4 .do_sync_write+0xcc/0x130
> [c0000000f963fce0] c00000000015ef44 .vfs_write+0xd0/0x1dc
> [c0000000f963fd80] c00000000015f158 .SyS_write+0x58/0xa0
> [c0000000f963fe30] c000000000008534 syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
> --- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 00000fff8fd1a8f8
> SP (fffc6270e00) is in userspace
>
> During the first 3 runs i did not see this issue, so might
> not be able to recreate this again. I have captured the dmesg
> log and have attached it.
>
> ext4 fs was created and mounted using :
>
> mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 /dev/sda4 3943948
> mount -t ext4 -o errors=panic,data=journal /dev/sda4 /mnt/tmp/
>
> The corresponding c code is :
>
> 1718 struct ext4_group_info *grp = ext4_get_group_info(ac->ac_sb,
> group);
> 1719 1720 BUG_ON(cr < 0 || cr >= 4);
> 1721 BUG_ON(EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(grp));
> 1722 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 1723 free = grp->bb_free;
>
> Thanks
> -Sachin
Can you try this patch ?
commit 43149bc800a6ae88b7d984558403e8d8cb045138
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu Sep 3 16:47:27 2009 +0530
ext4: check for good group with alloc_sem held
We need to make sure we check for good group with alloc_sem
held to make sure we prevent a parallel addition of new blocks
to the group via resize.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index cd25846..4623555 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2029,13 +2029,6 @@ repeat:
goto out;
}
- /*
- * If the particular group doesn't satisfy our
- * criteria we continue with the next group
- */
- if (!ext4_mb_good_group(ac, group, cr))
- continue;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 8:16 EXT4: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1721! Sachin Sant
2009-09-03 11:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2009-09-04 8:27 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-04 8:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-04 12:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-09-07 9:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-07 9:38 ` [PATCH -V2 1/3] ext4: move ext4_mb_init_group around Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-07 9:38 ` [PATCH -V2 2/3] ext4: check for need init flag in ext4_mb_load_buddy Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-07 9:38 ` [PATCH -V2 3/3] ext4: Clarify the locking details in mballoc Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-09-10 3:53 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903112003.GA13105@skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.