From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp>,
riel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, agk@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, nauman@google.com,
guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:36:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090908170649.GC8828@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090908134244.GA15974@redhat.com>
> > - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an
> > advantage.)
>
> I think this is more of a disadvantage than advantage. We have a very well
> defined functionality of cgroup in kernel to group the tasks. Now you are
> coming up with your own method of grouping the tasks which will make life
> even more confusing for users and application writers.
>
I would tend to agree with this. With other resource management
controllers using cgroups, having dm-ioband use something different will
require a different set of userspace tools/libraries to be used.
Something that will severly limit its usefulness froma programmer's
perspective.
thanks,
--
regards,
Dhaval
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-01 16:50 Regarding dm-ioband tests Vivek Goyal
2009-09-01 16:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-01 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-01 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-03 13:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-03 13:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-04 1:12 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-15 21:40 ` dm-ioband fairness in terms of sectors seems to be killing disk (Was: Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests) Vivek Goyal
2009-09-15 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-16 11:10 ` dm-ioband fairness in terms of sectors seems to be killing disk Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-16 11:10 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-04 4:02 ` Regarding dm-ioband tests Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-04 4:02 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-04 23:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-04 23:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-07 11:02 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-07 11:02 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-07 13:53 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-07 13:53 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-08 3:01 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-08 3:01 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-08 3:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-08 3:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-08 5:05 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-08 5:05 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-08 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-08 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 5:17 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 5:17 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 13:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 13:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-08 13:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-08 13:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-08 16:30 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-09-08 16:30 ` Nauman Rafique
2009-09-08 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-08 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-08 17:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-08 17:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-15 23:37 ` ioband: Writer starves reader even without competitors (Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests) Vivek Goyal
2009-09-15 23:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-16 12:08 ` ioband: Writer starves reader even without competitors Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-08 17:06 ` Dhaval Giani [this message]
2009-09-09 6:05 ` Regarding dm-ioband tests Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 6:05 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 10:51 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-09-10 7:58 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-10 7:58 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-11 9:53 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-09-15 15:12 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-15 15:12 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-15 15:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-15 15:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-15 15:58 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-15 15:58 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-15 16:21 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-15 16:21 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 13:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-10 3:06 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 10:01 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 14:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 14:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-10 3:45 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-10 13:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-10 13:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-08 19:24 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-08 19:24 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-09 0:09 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-09-09 2:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 2:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 15:41 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-09-09 17:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 17:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-09 19:01 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-09-09 9:24 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-09 9:24 ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-09-16 4:45 ` ioband: Limited fairness and weak isolation between groups (Was: Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests) Vivek Goyal
2009-09-16 4:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-18 7:33 ` ioband: Limited fairness and weak isolation between groups Ryo Tsuruta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090908170649.GC8828@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.