All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: P??draig Brady <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	CoreutilsBugs <bug-coreutils@gnu.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: fsetxattr() fails on a writable descriptor?
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:40:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090908184049.GA22050@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA6402D.8040209@draigBrady.com>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:29:49PM +0100, P??draig Brady wrote:
> fsetxattr() is failing for me when the permissions are readonly
> but the descriptor is writable as demonstrated by the program below.
> I've tried this on ext3 and ext4 with libattr-2.4.43-3.fc11.i586
> and linux-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.i586

That's not XFS specifci behaviour.  For all xattr operations, fd-based
or not we always do the full permission checks, and have done so since
day one.  Check the routined xattr_permission in fs/xattr.c of the
kernel tree.  It seems a bit unusual, but I'm not sure changing it now
is a good idea - the xattr support has been around for a long time.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: P??draig Brady <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, CoreutilsBugs <bug-coreutils@gnu.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsetxattr() fails on a writable descriptor?
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:40:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090908184049.GA22050@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA6402D.8040209@draigBrady.com>

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:29:49PM +0100, P??draig Brady wrote:
> fsetxattr() is failing for me when the permissions are readonly
> but the descriptor is writable as demonstrated by the program below.
> I've tried this on ext3 and ext4 with libattr-2.4.43-3.fc11.i586
> and linux-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.i586

That's not XFS specifci behaviour.  For all xattr operations, fd-based
or not we always do the full permission checks, and have done so since
day one.  Check the routined xattr_permission in fs/xattr.c of the
kernel tree.  It seems a bit unusual, but I'm not sure changing it now
is a good idea - the xattr support has been around for a long time.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-08 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1251987642.3855.36.camel@dhcp-lab-219.englab.brq.redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <4AA1A3E6.2020606@draigBrady.com>
     [not found]   ` <87k50den1e.fsf@meyering.net>
     [not found]     ` <1252309787.3852.8.camel@dhcp-lab-219.englab.brq.redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <4AA4C950.3080303@draigBrady.com>
     [not found]         ` <1252318482.3852.18.camel@dhcp-lab-219.englab.brq.redhat.com>
2009-09-08 11:29           ` fsetxattr() fails on a writable descriptor? Pádraig Brady
2009-09-08 18:40             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-09-08 18:40               ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-09 21:23               ` Pádraig Brady
2009-09-09 21:23                 ` Pádraig Brady
2009-09-09 22:14                 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-10-13 23:58                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-14  1:17                     ` Michael Monnerie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090908184049.GA22050@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=P@draigBrady.com \
    --cc=bug-coreutils@gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.