From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:17:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910141750.GA11969@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090910141415.GK607@duck.suse.cz>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:14:15PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 10-09-09 09:26:24, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:53:30PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 09-09-09 22:51:43, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > This was not a bug, since b_io is empty for kupdate writeback.
> > > > The next patch will do requeue_io() for non-kupdate writeback,
> > > > so let's fix it.
> > > But doesn't this patch also need your "anti-starvation" patch?
> >
> > Honza, can you show me that patch?
> >
> > > Looking into the code, we put inode to b_more_io when nr_to_write
> > > drops to zero and this way we'd just start writing it again
> > > in the next round...
> >
> > I'm confused. It's OK to start it in next round. Starvation can
> > occur if we start it immediately in the next writeback_inodes()
> > invocation. How can that happen with this patch?
> Sorry, my fault. For kupdate, we splice the list only once s_io is empty
> so that's not an issue. So the patch looks good.
> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Thank you :)
Regards,
Fengguang
> > > > CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> > > > Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
> > > > Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
> > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-09 21:41:14.000000000 +0800
> > > > +++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-09 21:45:15.000000000 +0800
> > > > @@ -313,11 +313,14 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct l
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > - * Queue all expired dirty inodes for io, eldest first.
> > > > + * Queue all expired dirty inodes for io, eldest first:
> > > > + * (newly dirtied) => b_dirty inodes
> > > > + * => b_more_io inodes
> > > > + * => remaining inodes in b_io => (dequeue for sync)
> > > > */
> > > > static void queue_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long *older_than_this)
> > > > {
> > > > - list_splice_init(&wb->b_more_io, wb->b_io.prev);
> > > > + list_splice_init(&wb->b_more_io, &wb->b_io);
> > > > move_expired_inodes(&wb->b_dirty, &wb->b_io, older_than_this);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > > SUSE Labs, CR
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 14:51 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] some random writeback fixes Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] writeback: cleanup writeback_single_inode() Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 15:45 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 15:53 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10 1:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 14:14 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10 14:17 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] writeback: merge for_kupdate and !for_kupdate requeue io logics Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] writeback: ensure large files are written in MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES chunks Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] writeback: use 64MB MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 23:29 ` Theodore Tso
2009-09-10 0:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 0:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 4:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 7:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] writeback: dont abort inode on congestion Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more than dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 15:44 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10 1:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 12:57 ` Chris Mason
2009-09-10 13:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 13:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 15:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 15:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 16:08 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910141750.GA11969@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.