All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:09:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090911200922.GF8137@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bplim1ce.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>


> Um..., sorry, I'm not sure what are you talking about. Of course, the
> problem of this is that system freeze on suspend.
> 
> Or are you asking my guess of the cause, or something?  If so, although
> I'm not reading all emails on this thread, from Zdenek's backtrace, the
> sequence would be
> 
>     1) suspend mmc
>     2) mmc generates card removed event
>     3) prepare to invalidate blockdev
>     4) sync fs on invalidating blockdev
>     5) flush buffers on invalidating blockdev (partitions)
>     6) delete blockdev (partitions)
> 
> or like the above. And I can guess some possible issues/root-cause we
> have to handle from it.
> 
>     a) card removed event from mmc for suspend is right design?
>     b) the card can be changed/removed before system was resumed, mmc
>        can be detect/handle it properly?
>     c) flushing buffers on _deleted_ device is right design?
> 
> and I suspect there are more issues in detail and resume process though.

I guess c) is main problem. If device is not there, how do you want to
flush buffers on it?

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-11 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-31 11:51 Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-31 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01  9:34   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 22:29     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 23:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-04  0:47         ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-04  9:13           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-05 17:22             ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-05 19:53               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-05 22:42                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-08  8:10                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-09 13:15                     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-07 12:51               ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-09 13:21                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-10 19:23                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11  6:39                     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-11 20:09                       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-09-11 21:14                         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:32                           ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:45                             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:51                               ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:22                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:05                                 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-09-14 20:25                                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:29                               ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:36                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14  8:39                                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-14 19:17                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:27                                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-18 11:15                                   ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-18 21:39                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:22                           ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:04                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:21                         ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:32                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 19:06           ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-08 19:48             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-09 13:52             ` OGAWA Hirofumi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090911200922.GF8137@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.