Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Unlike real hardware, vmport needs access to the CPU [...]

["Reimar Döffinger" <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>]

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> =?UTF-8?q?Reimar=20D=C3=B6ffinger?= wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger@gmx.de>
> > ---
> >  hw/vmport.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/vmport.c b/hw/vmport.c
> > index 884af3f..9a942ee 100644
> > --- a/hw/vmport.c
> > +++ b/hw/vmport.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >  #include "isa.h"
> >  #include "pc.h"
> >  #include "sysemu.h"
> > +#include "kvm.h"
> >  
> >  //#define VMPORT_DEBUG
> >  
> > @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ static uint32_t vmport_ioport_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
> >      unsigned char command;
> >      uint32_t eax;
> >  
> > +    cpu_synchronize_state(env);
> >      eax = env->regs[R_EAX];
> >      if (eax != VMPORT_MAGIC)
> >          return eax;
> 
> Ack (qemu-kvm carries a similar patch).

Now that I look at it... yes.
Except that it does not yet have cpu_synchronize_state and thus is broken for
vmport_ioport_write, the return value written to EAX is lost.

> But please grant your patches some proper titles.

Sorry, I am still figuring out how to write commit messages that git format-patch
handles in a good way (as well as the most sane way to use it in
general).