All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
To: "Majed B." <majedb@gmail.com>
Cc: Jon@ehardcastle.com, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
	Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LVM and Raid5
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:15:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916131536.GA3752@arachsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70ed7c3e0909160400k578741e7ue687d8fd983d0d12@mail.gmail.com>

"Majed B." <majedb@gmail.com> writes:

> I tested with both dd and hdparm, and in both cases, md0 proved to be
> much faster than the LV itself.

This is quite odd because usually an LVM2 logical volume is just a simple
linear device-mapper target onto the backing device. I could imagine a small
performance change but a large one really surprises me. Could there be
something going on here wrt sync vs non-sync IO?

Best wishes,

Chris.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-16 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-16  8:22 LVM and Raid5 Linux Raid Study
2009-09-16  9:42 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-16 10:09 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-16 10:20   ` Majed B.
2009-09-16 10:33     ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-16 11:00       ` Majed B.
2009-09-16 13:15         ` Chris Webb [this message]
2009-09-21 17:34     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-17 12:37 ` Michal Soltys
2009-09-21 14:33   ` [linux-lvm] " Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 14:33     ` Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 16:30     ` [linux-lvm] " Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-21 16:30       ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-21 17:26       ` [linux-lvm] " Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 17:26         ` Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 17:38     ` Linux Raid Study
2009-09-21 19:14       ` Majed B.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090916131536.GA3752@arachsys.com \
    --to=chris@arachsys.com \
    --cc=Jon@ehardcastle.com \
    --cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxraid.study@gmail.com \
    --cc=majedb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.