All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jon@eHardcastle.com,
	LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>,
	Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: LVM and Raid5
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:26:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090921172611.GA21276@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <684876.38078.qm@web51302.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

On Mon, Sep 21 2009 at 12:30pm -0400,
Jon Hardcastle <jd_hardcastle@yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- On Mon, 21/9/09, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: LVM and Raid5
> > To: "Michal Soltys" <soltys@ziu.info>
> > Cc: "Linux Raid Study" <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@redhat.com
> > Date: Monday, 21 September, 2009, 3:33 PM
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:37 AM,
> > Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
> > wrote:
> > > Linux Raid Study wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello:
> > >>
> > >> Has someone experimented with LVM and Raid5
> > together (on say, 2.6.27)?
> > >> Is there any performance drop if LVM/Raid5 are
> > combined vs Raid5 alone?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for your inputs!
> > >
> > > Few things to consider when setting up LVM on MD
> > raid:
> > >
> > > - readahead set on lvm device
> > >
> > > It defaults to 256 on any LVM device, while MD will
> > set it accordingly to
> > > the amount of disks present in the raid. If you do
> > tests on a filesystem,
> > > you may see significant differences due to that. YMMV
> > depending on the type
> > > of used benchmark(s).
> > >
> > > - filesystem awareness of underlying raid
> > >
> > > For example, xfs created on top of raid, will
> > generally get the parameters
> > > right (stripe unit, stripe width), but if it's xfs on
> > lvm on raid, then it
> > > won't - you will have to provide them manually.
> > >
> > > - alignment between LVM chunks and MD chunks
> > >
> > > Make sure that extent area used for actual logical
> > volumes start at the
> > > boundary of stripe unit - you can adjust the LVM's
> > metadata size during
> > > pvcreate (by default it's 192KiB, so with non-default
> > stripe unit it may
> > > cause issues, although I vaguely recall posts that
> > current LVM is MD aware
> > > during initialization). Of course LVM must itself
> > start at the boundary for
> > > that to make any sense (and it doesn't have to be the
> > case - for example if
> > > you use partitionable MD).
> > 
> > All of the above have been resolved in recent LVM2
> > userspace (2.02.51
> > being the most recent release with all these
> > addressed).� The last
> > issue you mention (partitionable MD alignment offset) is
> > also resolved
> > when a recent LVM2 is coupled with Linux 2.6.31 (which
> > provides IO
> > Topology support).
> > 
> > Mike
> > --
> 
> When you say 'resolved' are we talking automatically? if so, when the
> volumes are created... etc etc?

Yes, automatically when the volumes are created.

The relevant lvm.conf options (enabled by default) are:

devices/md_chunk_alignment (useful for LVM on MD w/ Linux < 2.6.31)
devices/data_alignment_detection
devices/data_alignment_offset_detection

readahead defaults to "auto" in lvm.conf:
activation/readahead

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jon@eHardcastle.com,
	LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Raid Study <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>,
	Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
Subject: Re: LVM and Raid5
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:26:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090921172611.GA21276@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <684876.38078.qm@web51302.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

On Mon, Sep 21 2009 at 12:30pm -0400,
Jon Hardcastle <jd_hardcastle@yahoo.com> wrote:

> --- On Mon, 21/9/09, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: LVM and Raid5
> > To: "Michal Soltys" <soltys@ziu.info>
> > Cc: "Linux Raid Study" <linuxraid.study@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@redhat.com
> > Date: Monday, 21 September, 2009, 3:33 PM
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:37 AM,
> > Michal Soltys <soltys@ziu.info>
> > wrote:
> > > Linux Raid Study wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello:
> > >>
> > >> Has someone experimented with LVM and Raid5
> > together (on say, 2.6.27)?
> > >> Is there any performance drop if LVM/Raid5 are
> > combined vs Raid5 alone?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for your inputs!
> > >
> > > Few things to consider when setting up LVM on MD
> > raid:
> > >
> > > - readahead set on lvm device
> > >
> > > It defaults to 256 on any LVM device, while MD will
> > set it accordingly to
> > > the amount of disks present in the raid. If you do
> > tests on a filesystem,
> > > you may see significant differences due to that. YMMV
> > depending on the type
> > > of used benchmark(s).
> > >
> > > - filesystem awareness of underlying raid
> > >
> > > For example, xfs created on top of raid, will
> > generally get the parameters
> > > right (stripe unit, stripe width), but if it's xfs on
> > lvm on raid, then it
> > > won't - you will have to provide them manually.
> > >
> > > - alignment between LVM chunks and MD chunks
> > >
> > > Make sure that extent area used for actual logical
> > volumes start at the
> > > boundary of stripe unit - you can adjust the LVM's
> > metadata size during
> > > pvcreate (by default it's 192KiB, so with non-default
> > stripe unit it may
> > > cause issues, although I vaguely recall posts that
> > current LVM is MD aware
> > > during initialization). Of course LVM must itself
> > start at the boundary for
> > > that to make any sense (and it doesn't have to be the
> > case - for example if
> > > you use partitionable MD).
> > 
> > All of the above have been resolved in recent LVM2
> > userspace (2.02.51
> > being the most recent release with all these
> > addressed).  The last
> > issue you mention (partitionable MD alignment offset) is
> > also resolved
> > when a recent LVM2 is coupled with Linux 2.6.31 (which
> > provides IO
> > Topology support).
> > 
> > Mike
> > --
> 
> When you say 'resolved' are we talking automatically? if so, when the
> volumes are created... etc etc?

Yes, automatically when the volumes are created.

The relevant lvm.conf options (enabled by default) are:

devices/md_chunk_alignment (useful for LVM on MD w/ Linux < 2.6.31)
devices/data_alignment_detection
devices/data_alignment_offset_detection

readahead defaults to "auto" in lvm.conf:
activation/readahead

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-21 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-16  8:22 LVM and Raid5 Linux Raid Study
2009-09-16  9:42 ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-16 10:09 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-16 10:20   ` Majed B.
2009-09-16 10:33     ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-16 11:00       ` Majed B.
2009-09-16 13:15         ` Chris Webb
2009-09-21 17:34     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-17 12:37 ` Michal Soltys
2009-09-21 14:33   ` [linux-lvm] " Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 14:33     ` Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 16:30     ` [linux-lvm] " Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-21 16:30       ` Jon Hardcastle
2009-09-21 17:26       ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2009-09-21 17:26         ` Mike Snitzer
2009-09-21 17:38     ` Linux Raid Study
2009-09-21 19:14       ` Majed B.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090921172611.GA21276@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jon@eHardcastle.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxraid.study@gmail.com \
    --cc=soltys@ziu.info \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.