Re: [Patch 1/2] cld: implement dynamic port

[Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:19:41 -0400, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 02:15 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:01:52 -0400, Jeff Garzik<jeff@garzik.org>  wrote:
> >
> >> though for uniformity, I lean towards thinking that the daemon should
> >> always write a port file, regardless of whether the port was manually
> >> specified or automatically bound.
> >
> > I have a better idea. Let's split PortFile from the enabling
> > of auto ports. We can have<Port>  to with a special string "auto",
> > and let<PortFile>  to be set when static port is configured.
> 
> I think that's fair...

I have posted tabled already, so we have all three in exactly the
same, old scheme now. I'll patch it over. Not sure if I can make it
compatible though... There may be another flag day. Sorry.

I realized my folly when <PortFile>/dev/null</PortFile> appeared.
Probably would've fixed it anyway.

-- Pete