Re: [PATCH 1/1 - try2] ASoC: add support for multiple cards/codecs in debugfs

[Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 02:02:04PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On Thursday 01 October 2009 13:51:07 ext Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'd rather use dev_name() for the CODEC itself if possible, that is more
> > likely to be stable going forward and one of the immediate aims with the
> > API refactoring is to remove socdev entirely at runtime.

> At this point the codec->dev was NULL, that is why I have used the socdev->dev 
> instead.

Right, your CODEC driver needs updating to current APIs.  Omitting the
device name is a good fallback here since you won't be able to have more
than one of the same device anyway if a device isn't provided.

> > >  		ret = snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax(substream->runtime,

> > but this doesn't seem to accomplish that goal?  I can't actually spot
> > the difference either, I'm assuming it's just whitespace?  If so I'll
> > apply as-is.

> It is my editor, which removed the tailing space from that line, I have 
> mentioned it in the intro mail.

Oh, right.  Like I was saying yesterday it's better to not use a
separate cover letter for single patches.