All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU"
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:13:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910051613.32631.elendil@planet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910051500.55875.elendil@planet.nl>

On Monday 05 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> With .32-rc3 I'm getting occasional skips from amarok while playing
> music from an NFS share (3 today so far), something I've not had in a
> long time.
>
> The reason looks to be that latencytop consistently shows 'iwlagn' as
> the top affected process with "Scheduler: waiting for CPU".
> Values of 100-140 ms occur frequently, but I've also seen higher values
> (180, 207). I don't remember seeing iwlagn high in the list before, but
> I have not checked earlier kernels yet.
>
> Added to that 'phy0' also frequently shows high with values of 25-75 ms.
>
> The system is otherwise essentially idle. Other processes typically show
> a latency < 5 ms.

If I give the system some work to do (like compiling a kernel), the 
latencies on iwlagn and phy0 disappear (values < 5 ms).
Is this related to ondemand frequency scaling?

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-05 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-05 13:00 [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU" Frans Pop
2009-10-05 14:13 ` Frans Pop [this message]
2009-10-05 14:24   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-06 15:49     ` Frans Pop
2009-10-07 17:10       ` Frans Pop
2009-10-07 18:10         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-07 18:34         ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08  4:05           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08  6:23             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:40             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 14:13               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 14:54                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 14:55               ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 15:09                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 18:23                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 20:34                   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-10-09  3:35                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09  3:51                       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-10-08 20:59                   ` Frans Pop
2009-10-09  3:04                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09  6:35                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09  7:13                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09  7:55                       ` Sedat Dilek
2009-10-09  7:55                         ` Sedat Dilek
2009-10-09  8:06                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09  8:06                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09 14:23                       ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Update the clock of runqueue select_task_rq() selected tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2009-10-09 16:27                       ` [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU" Frans Pop
2009-10-09 20:06                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 15:30               ` [tip:timers/urgent] x86, timers: Check for pending timers after (device) interrupts tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-09 14:23               ` [tip:sched/urgent] Revert "x86, timers: Check for pending timers after (device) interrupts" tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-10-08 11:24           ` [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting for CPU" Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:09             ` Frans Pop
2009-10-08 13:18               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-08 13:45             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-08 14:15               ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910051613.32631.elendil@planet.nl \
    --to=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.