From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
drbd-dev-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Philipp Reisner
<philipp.reisner-63ez5xqkn6DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:33:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091007063354.GG5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007135505.df1f058c.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Oct 07 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_start_io_acct':
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:43: error: lvalue required as increment operand
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_end_io_acct':
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:56: error: lvalue required as decrement operand
>
> This is back again :-(
>
> I have used the block tree from next-20091006 for today. I also had to
> use the device-mapper tree from next-20091006 since that is based on the
> block tree.
Irk darn, I fixed this up. Sorry about that, Stephen. It was due to the
in_flight counter being reverted for -rc3 and now back functional in my
upstream branch.
--
Jens Axboe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] linux-next: block tree build failure
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:33:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091007063354.GG5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007135505.df1f058c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Oct 07 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_start_io_acct':
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:43: error: lvalue required as increment operand
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_end_io_acct':
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:56: error: lvalue required as decrement operand
>
> This is back again :-(
>
> I have used the block tree from next-20091006 for today. I also had to
> use the device-mapper tree from next-20091006 since that is based on the
> block tree.
Irk darn, I fixed this up. Sorry about that, Stephen. It was due to the
in_flight counter being reverted for -rc3 and now back functional in my
upstream branch.
--
Jens Axboe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>,
drbd-dev@linbit.com, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:33:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091007063354.GG5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007135505.df1f058c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Oct 07 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_start_io_acct':
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:43: error: lvalue required as increment operand
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c: In function '_drbd_end_io_acct':
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:56: error: lvalue required as decrement operand
>
> This is back again :-(
>
> I have used the block tree from next-20091006 for today. I also had to
> use the device-mapper tree from next-20091006 since that is based on the
> block tree.
Irk darn, I fixed this up. Sorry about that, Stephen. It was due to the
in_flight counter being reverted for -rc3 and now back functional in my
upstream branch.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 2:55 linux-next: block tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-07 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-07 2:55 ` [Drbd-dev] " Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20091007135505.df1f058c.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-07 6:33 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-10-07 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 6:33 ` [Drbd-dev] " Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-07 8:44 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 8:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-07 9:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 9:28 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-04 3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-04 7:43 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-04 13:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-04 22:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-05 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-27 3:34 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-27 5:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-27 5:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-23 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-23 4:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-23 7:11 ` Lars Ellenberg
2009-09-23 7:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20090923071152.GA8000-pI6ZZpWkm2Ob3Om96lsyHpni2hclXnRB@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-23 11:12 ` Lars Ellenberg
2009-09-23 11:12 ` Lars Ellenberg
[not found] ` <20090923111225.GC8000-pI6ZZpWkm2Ob3Om96lsyHpni2hclXnRB@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-23 11:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-23 11:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 6:25 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-11 4:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-11 5:30 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-01 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-01 5:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-01 5:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-01 8:13 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-01 8:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 3:49 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 6:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-07 6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-07 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-08 3:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-08 6:55 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-07 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-08 0:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-26 2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-26 4:34 ` NeilBrown
2009-06-26 4:39 ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-26 5:49 ` Neil Brown
2009-06-26 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-25 4:35 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-25 5:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-05-25 5:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-13 4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-13 9:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-13 12:07 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-15 0:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 2:35 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-15 2:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-15 3:24 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-15 3:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-09 3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 2:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 6:21 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-14 6:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-14 6:32 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-26 10:29 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-26 10:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 10:47 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-26 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 11:20 ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-26 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 11:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-26 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <20081110145442.d60e57b7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-11-10 4:13 ` malahal
2008-11-10 4:46 ` malahal
2008-11-10 12:12 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-18 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-18 4:31 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-15 5:18 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-15 5:38 ` Alex Dubov
2008-09-15 13:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-03 6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-03 6:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-03 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-09-03 8:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-03 16:05 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-03 16:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-03 17:29 ` Tejun Heo
2008-09-04 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-29 5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-29 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] <20080627165326.9222c841.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-06-27 7:00 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-27 7:14 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091007063354.GG5216@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe-qhclzuegtsvqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=agk-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=drbd-dev-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=philipp.reisner-63ez5xqkn6DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.