All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	kiran@scalex86.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] store-free path walking
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:44:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091009104400.GG17818@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091008.231527.251721755.davem@davemloft.net>

On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:15:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:50:50 +0200
> 
> > OK, I got rid of this guy from the RCU walk. Basically now hold
> > vfsmount_lock over the entire RCU path walk (which also pins the mnt)
> > and use a seqlock in the fs struct to get a consistent mnt,dentry
> > pair. This also simplifies the walk because we don't need the
> > complexity to avoid mntget/mntput (just do one final mntget on the
> > resulting mnt before dropping vfsmount_lock).
> > 
> > vfsmount_lock adds one per-cpu atomic for the spinlock, and we
> > remove two thread-shared atomics for fs->lock so a net win for
> > both single threaded performance and thread-shared scalability.
> > Latency is no problem because we hold rcu_read_lock for the same
> > length of time anyway.
> > 
> > The parallel git diff workload is improved by serveral percent.
> 
> Sounds sweet Nick, can't wait to play with your next set of
> patches here.

Oh and the RCU patch there just in case you want to try some file
open/close benchmarks. Turns out I broke Paul's new scalable RCU ;)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-09 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-06  6:49 Latest vfs scalability patch Nick Piggin
2009-10-06 10:14 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 10:26   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 11:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-06 12:51       ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 12:26   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-06 12:49     ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07  8:58       ` [rfc][patch] store-free path walking Nick Piggin
2009-10-07  9:56         ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 10:10           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12  3:58           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12  5:59             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12  8:20               ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-12 11:00                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-13  1:26             ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13  1:52               ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 14:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 16:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 16:46             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 19:25               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 20:34                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 20:51                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 21:06                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 21:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 21:57                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 22:22                           ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-08  7:39                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 17:53                               ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-08 13:12                           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-10-09  7:47                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 17:49                             ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 16:29           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 12:36           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 12:57             ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-08 13:22               ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 13:30                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-08 18:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09  4:04                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09  8:54                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09  9:51                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:02                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 10:08                       ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:07                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09  3:50             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09  6:15               ` David Miller
2009-10-09 10:40                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 11:09                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:44                 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-10-09 10:48                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 23:16         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-15 10:08 ` Latest vfs scalability patch Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 10:39   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 10:46     ` Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 10:53   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 11:23     ` Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 11:41       ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 11:48         ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091009104400.GG17818@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.