All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] store-free path walking
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:26:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091013012627.GA19089@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091012035843.GC25882@wotan.suse.de>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:58:43AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Tridge, Samba people: measuring vfs performance with dbench
> in my effort to improve Linux vfs scalability has shown up
> the statvfs syscall you make to be the final problematic
> issue for this workload. In particular reading /proc/mounts
> that glibc does to impement it. We could add complexity to
> the kernel to try improving it, or we could extend the
> statfs syscall so glibc can avoid the issue (requiring
> glibc upgrade). But I would like to know whether samba
> really uses statvfs() significantly?

Not sure if it's the reason why Samba uses it, but many portable
applications use statvfs because that is the standardizes one in
XPG / recent Posix while statfs is just a BSD extension Linux picked
up.  So making sure statvfs goes fast is a pretty essential thing.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-06  6:49 Latest vfs scalability patch Nick Piggin
2009-10-06 10:14 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 10:26   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 11:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-06 12:51       ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 12:26   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-06 12:49     ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07  8:58       ` [rfc][patch] store-free path walking Nick Piggin
2009-10-07  9:56         ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 10:10           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12  3:58           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12  5:59             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12  8:20               ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-12 11:00                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-13  1:26             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-10-13  1:52               ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 14:56         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 16:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 16:46             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 19:25               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 20:34                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 20:51                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 21:06                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 21:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 21:57                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 22:22                           ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-08  7:39                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 17:53                               ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-08 13:12                           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-10-09  7:47                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 17:49                             ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 16:29           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 12:36           ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 12:57             ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-08 13:22               ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 13:30                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-08 18:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09  4:04                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09  8:54                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09  9:51                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:02                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 10:08                       ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:07                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09  3:50             ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09  6:15               ` David Miller
2009-10-09 10:40                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 11:09                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:44                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 10:48                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 23:16         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-15 10:08 ` Latest vfs scalability patch Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 10:39   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 10:46     ` Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 10:53   ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 11:23     ` Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 11:41       ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 11:48         ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091013012627.GA19089@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.