All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@jbarnes-g45>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not available
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:45:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910122145.38067.thomas.schlichter@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD380A2.2030101@vmware.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]

Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> One problem with this patch is that it conflicts with the way graphics
> drivers traditionally handles
> the situation, namely
> 
> 1) Set up mtrr
> 2) Map. If fallback to uncached minus we will still have write-combined
> access.
> 
> I think mtrr-add used in this fashion will typically fail due to the
> alignment constraints. In particular,
> for set_memory_wc() the typical usage pattern is a large number of pages
> in a fragmented physical address space.

Yes, maybe this patch tries to change current behavior too less. Indeed, if 
setting up MTRR entries it simply behaves as today, and userspace does not see 
that write combining is not correctly enabled.

> So if we were to fix the problem with libpciaccess in the kernel, I
> think the best option would be to fail the user-space mapping when we
> can't make it write-combined.

One idea to do this would be the attached patch. It simply returns an error if 
PAT is not available. It does not even try to use MTRR on its own. But maybe 
even better would be to combine both patches to something like this:
 1. try to use PAT
 2. if this fails try to set up MTRR
 3. if this also fails, return error

Kind regards,
  Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Do-not-mmap-ioremap-uncached-when-WC-is-requested.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2707 bytes --]

From afb48e1a1ef035c4580a5ce59a956b54a56a5c18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 00:42:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Do not mmap/ioremap uncached when WC is requested

X.org uses libpciaccess which tries to mmap with write combining enabled via
/sys/bus/pci/devices/*/resource0_wc. Currently, when PAT is not enabled, we
fall back to uncached mmap. Then libpciaccess thinks it succeeded mapping
with write combining anabled and does not set up suited MTRR entries. ;-(

So instead of silently falling back to uncached mapping, we better fail. In
this case libpciaccess mmaps via /sys/bus/pci/devices/*/resource0 and correctly
sets up MTRR entries.

Aditionally modify ioremap_wc and set_memory_wc to match this behavior.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>
---
 arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c  |   10 +++++-----
 arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c |    2 +-
 arch/x86/pci/i386.c    |    6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
index 334e63c..293581e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
@@ -268,11 +268,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioremap_nocache);
  */
 void __iomem *ioremap_wc(resource_size_t phys_addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (pat_enabled)
-		return __ioremap_caller(phys_addr, size, _PAGE_CACHE_WC,
-					__builtin_return_address(0));
-	else
-		return ioremap_nocache(phys_addr, size);
+	if (!pat_enabled)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return __ioremap_caller(phys_addr, size, _PAGE_CACHE_WC,
+				__builtin_return_address(0));
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioremap_wc);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index dd38bfb..b1287a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ int set_memory_wc(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!pat_enabled)
-		return set_memory_uc(addr, numpages);
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	ret = reserve_memtype(__pa(addr), __pa(addr) + numpages * PAGE_SIZE,
 		_PAGE_CACHE_WC, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
index b22d13b..cf63f9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
@@ -281,6 +281,12 @@ int pci_mmap_page_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (mmap_state == pci_mmap_io)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* We cannot mmap write combining (WC) without PAT enabled.
+	 * So better fail and let the user map without WC and use MTRR.
+	 */
+	if (!pat_enabled && write_combine)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	prot = pgprot_val(vma->vm_page_prot);
 	if (pat_enabled && write_combine)
 		prot |= _PAGE_CACHE_WC;
-- 
1.6.4.4


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-12 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200910122032.52168.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
2009-10-12 19:16 ` [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not available Thomas Hellstrom
2009-10-12 19:45   ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
     [not found]     ` <1255378684.2063.5.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
2009-10-13 21:05       ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 14:41 Thomas Schlichter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-22 14:27 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 12:08 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 12:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-22 13:26   ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 13:35 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-21 14:38 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-21 13:45 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 14:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-21 17:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 20:01     ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22  9:53       ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 15:34         ` Eric Anholt
2009-10-22 21:47           ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 23:10             ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-23  0:11               ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23  1:53                 ` Eric Anholt
2009-10-23  4:31                   ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-23  4:58                     ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23  7:24                       ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-23 14:24                         ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23 14:37                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23  4:33                   ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-19 15:10 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 15:07 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 14:59 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 21:49   ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-20 20:35   ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-20 21:59     ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-21 11:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 14:47 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-20 19:54 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 11:57   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13  7:34 Jan Beulich
2009-10-13 21:29 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-14  8:13   ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-14 19:14     ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-15  7:48       ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-17 19:48         ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19  9:16           ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-19 13:44             ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-19 13:54               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 13:36           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-10-10  1:22 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-10  4:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-10  8:31   ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-10 15:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-10 17:50       ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-11  7:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-11  9:56       ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-11 18:51   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-11 18:54     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-11 20:19       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-12 18:09         ` Robert Hancock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910122145.38067.thomas.schlichter@web.de \
    --to=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@jbarnes-g45 \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.