From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread().
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:49:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091020074908.GA4939@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091019232431.GB18597@linux-sh.org>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 08:24:32AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Oh you have based SH breakpoint support on top of the current breakpoint
> > API in -tip?
> >
> > Hm, you should have talked to us about that since it's being reworked.
> >
> Strange, I thought that's what I was doing ;-)
[...]
> I wanted to get the initial support out of the way early to see if there
> was anything in the generic code that needed work, but apart from some
> minor stuff it's been kept fairly well isolated. The SH support I have
> works fine, but isn't a lot of code, and can trivially be reworked on top
> of whatever the new interface looks like. I've left out things like
> ptrace and kgdb stub integration precisely because I knew the code was
> being reworked.
>
> Given that, I'm not in any particular rush, so whenever the reworked
> patches are available, I'll give them a run and rebase accordingly.
Ah ok. I was just worrying you thought the current state is stable.
Ok, no problem then, Thanks. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 10:23 [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread() Paul Mundt
2009-10-05 10:49 ` K.Prasad
2009-10-09 3:40 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-09 7:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-17 23:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-18 6:25 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-18 16:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-19 19:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-19 23:24 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-20 7:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-11-21 13:36 ` [tip:perf/core] x86/hw-breakpoints: " tip-bot for Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091020074908.GA4939@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.