From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org,
devel-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org,
linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi-ml: adds queue_depth ramp up code
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:54:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091020185426.GA5905@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091016230824.18916.84116.stgit-M4Lc0Xp98oKtqXYlAKuG4QC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:08:24PM -0700, Vasu Dev wrote:
> -v3
> Moves max_queue_depth initialization after slave_configure is
> called from after slave_alloc calling done. Also adjusted
> max_queue_depth check to skip ramp up if current queue_depth
> is >= max_queue_depth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Looks good to me. I ran some tests on s390 and the queue depth counter
increased until hitting the defined maximum.
> @@ -779,6 +781,36 @@ static struct device_attribute sdev_attr_queue_depth_rw =
> sdev_store_queue_depth_rw);
>
> static ssize_t
> +sdev_show_queue_ramp_up_period(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdev;
> + sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> + return snprintf(buf, 20, "%lu\n", sdev->queue_ramp_up_period);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +sdev_store_queue_ramp_up_period(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> + unsigned long period;
> +
> + if (strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &period))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + sdev->queue_ramp_up_period = period;
> + return period;
> +}
[...]
> + unsigned long queue_ramp_up_period; /* ramp up period in jiffies */
> +#define SCSI_DEFAULT_RAMP_UP_PERIOD (120 * HZ)
Only a small inconvenience i guess: The sysfs attribute shows the
ramp-up-period in jiffies. On my system with HZ==100 the default is
12000 and i was wondering if this would be milliseconds or something
related. If HZ changes, the unit of the ramp-up-period also changes.
I would prefer having seconds or milliseconds in sysfs and only using
jiffies internally.
Thanks for doing this,
Christof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-16 0:46 [PATCH v2 1/7] scsi-ml: modify change_queue_depth to take in reason why it is being called Vasu Dev
[not found] ` <20091016004639.22451.76363.stgit-M4Lc0Xp98oKtqXYlAKuG4QC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-16 0:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] scsi error: have scsi-ml call change_queue_depth to handle QUEUE_FULL Vasu Dev
2009-10-16 0:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] libfc: convert libfc calling scsi_track_queue_full Vasu Dev
2009-10-16 0:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] fcoe, libfc: fix an libfc issue with queue ramp down in libfc Vasu Dev
2009-10-16 0:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] scsi-ml: adds queue_depth ramp up code Vasu Dev
[not found] ` <20091016004700.22451.42962.stgit-M4Lc0Xp98oKtqXYlAKuG4QC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-16 9:29 ` Christof Schmitt
[not found] ` <20091016092912.GA7199-VuU8Q2ydlaqCpDFQwvYvMTJtLkR7yuzc@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-16 18:16 ` Vasu Dev
2009-10-16 23:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Vasu Dev
[not found] ` <20091016230824.18916.84116.stgit-M4Lc0Xp98oKtqXYlAKuG4QC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-20 18:54 ` Christof Schmitt [this message]
2009-10-20 22:32 ` Vasu Dev
2009-10-20 23:14 ` [Open-FCoE] " Joe Eykholt
[not found] ` <4ADE444D.5090307-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-21 7:49 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-21 17:45 ` [Open-FCoE] " Vasu Dev
[not found] ` <20091021074944.GA3563-VuU8Q2ydlaqCpDFQwvYvMTJtLkR7yuzc@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-21 17:54 ` Giridhar Malavali
2009-10-21 13:11 ` [Open-FCoE] " James Smart
2009-10-21 13:37 ` Michael Reed
2009-10-22 22:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] " Vasu Dev
2009-10-23 13:53 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 17:51 ` Giridhar Malavali
2009-10-16 0:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] libfc: adds queue_depth ramp up to libfc Vasu Dev
2009-10-16 0:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] zfcp: Adapt change_queue_depth for queue full tracking Vasu Dev
2009-10-28 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] scsi-ml: modify change_queue_depth to take in reason why it is being called James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1256770118.2989.24.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-29 1:43 ` Vasu Dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091020185426.GA5905@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com \
--to=christof.schmitt-ta70fqpds9bqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley-d9PhHud1JfjCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devel-s9riP+hp16TNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vasu.dev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.