From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: djwong@us.ibm.com
Cc: Crane Cai <crane.cai@amd.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-scmi: Quirk to work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:37:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022203746.575d3928@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091022174304.GO26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:43:04 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:17:53PM +0800, Crane Cai wrote:
>
> > This patch below represents my meanings:
> > *) add a new HID for IBM SMBus CMI devices
> > *) add methods for IBM SMBus CMI devices as you did
> > *) hook different HID with different control methods set
> > It may be more smooth for i2c-scmi, please consider.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> I still need the changes to drivers/acpi/scan.c, but if you push this patch
> upstream then I'll reroll my patch as a follow-on to yours...
>
> > static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_smbus_cmi_ids[] = {
> > - {"SMBUS01", 0},
> > + {"SMBUS01", (kernel_ulong_t)&smbus_methods},
> > + {"SMBUSIBM", (kernel_ulong_t)&ibm_smbus_methods},
>
> ...with the custom HID string #define'd in a header file someplace.
>
> Actually, if you'll add a Signed-off-by line to your patch, I'll submit both of
> them as a patchset and save you a little work. :)
As soon as there is an agreement on how the problem would better be
addressed, I'll be happy to pick the patches.
> > + for (; id->id[0]; id++)
>
> Stylistic nit--would it be clearer to initialize id in the for loop instead of
> at the beginning of the function?
Definitely, yes.
--
Jean Delvare
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: djwong@us.ibm.com
Cc: Crane Cai <crane.cai@amd.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-scmi: Quirk to work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:37:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022203746.575d3928@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091022174304.GO26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:43:04 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:17:53PM +0800, Crane Cai wrote:
>
> > This patch below represents my meanings:
> > *) add a new HID for IBM SMBus CMI devices
> > *) add methods for IBM SMBus CMI devices as you did
> > *) hook different HID with different control methods set
> > It may be more smooth for i2c-scmi, please consider.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> I still need the changes to drivers/acpi/scan.c, but if you push this patch
> upstream then I'll reroll my patch as a follow-on to yours...
>
> > static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_smbus_cmi_ids[] = {
> > - {"SMBUS01", 0},
> > + {"SMBUS01", (kernel_ulong_t)&smbus_methods},
> > + {"SMBUSIBM", (kernel_ulong_t)&ibm_smbus_methods},
>
> ...with the custom HID string #define'd in a header file someplace.
>
> Actually, if you'll add a Signed-off-by line to your patch, I'll submit both of
> them as a patchset and save you a little work. :)
As soon as there is an agreement on how the problem would better be
addressed, I'll be happy to pick the patches.
> > + for (; id->id[0]; id++)
>
> Stylistic nit--would it be clearer to initialize id in the for loop instead of
> at the beginning of the function?
Definitely, yes.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 23:11 [PATCH] i2c-scmi: Quirk to work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-21 2:30 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-21 14:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] ` <200910210857.13978.bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-21 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-21 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-22 7:17 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-22 17:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-22 17:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-22 18:37 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-10-22 18:37 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-23 4:44 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c-scmi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-23 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
[not found] ` <20091023170306.GP26149-bjhdApgbSaxhsM67afOH+sxtgHpCUUYS@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-25 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-25 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20091025103932.31ce9a6d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-26 2:54 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-26 2:54 ` Crane Cai
2009-10-23 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] acpi: " Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-23 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-25 11:53 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-26 20:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-26 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-27 17:03 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-27 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
[not found] ` <20091027173001.GT26149-bjhdApgbSaxhsM67afOH+sxtgHpCUUYS@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-27 17:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-12-04 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
[not found] ` <20091204170621.GA10356-bjhdApgbSaxhsM67afOH+sxtgHpCUUYS@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-04 17:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-12-04 17:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] ` <200912041036.36686.bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-04 18:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-04 18:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-04 18:11 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI: Quirk to make SMBus objects work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-04 18:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-17 14:02 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-05 12:30 ` Jean Delvare
2009-12-04 18:13 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] i2c-scmi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices Darrick J. Wong
2009-12-04 18:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-26 21:00 ` [PATCH " Darrick J. Wong
2009-10-27 17:24 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091022203746.575d3928@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=crane.cai@amd.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.