All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] virtio: order used ring after used index read
@ 2009-10-25 12:22 Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-10-25 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: virtualization, kvm, Rusty Russell

On SMP guests, reads from the ring might bypass
used index reads. This causes guest crashes
because host writes to used index to signal ring data
readiness.
Fix this by inserting rmb before used ring reads.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---

Rusty, I see guest crashes with virtio net on vhost sometimes,
and the following seems to help.
This seems an obviously correct thing to do, anyway.
If you think so, too, can this be queued for 2.6.32 please?
Thanks,

 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index f536005..4c4df3e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ static void *vring_get_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned int *len)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
+        /* Only get used array entries after they have been exposed by host. */
+	rmb();
+
 	i = vq->vring.used->ring[vq->last_used_idx%vq->vring.num].id;
 	*len = vq->vring.used->ring[vq->last_used_idx%vq->vring.num].len;
 
-- 
1.6.5.rc2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] virtio: order used ring after used index read
@ 2009-10-25 12:22 Michael S. Tsirkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2009-10-25 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: virtualization, kvm, Rusty Russell

On SMP guests, reads from the ring might bypass
used index reads. This causes guest crashes
because host writes to used index to signal ring data
readiness.
Fix this by inserting rmb before used ring reads.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---

Rusty, I see guest crashes with virtio net on vhost sometimes,
and the following seems to help.
This seems an obviously correct thing to do, anyway.
If you think so, too, can this be queued for 2.6.32 please?
Thanks,

 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index f536005..4c4df3e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ static void *vring_get_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned int *len)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
+        /* Only get used array entries after they have been exposed by host. */
+	rmb();
+
 	i = vq->vring.used->ring[vq->last_used_idx%vq->vring.num].id;
 	*len = vq->vring.used->ring[vq->last_used_idx%vq->vring.num].len;
 
-- 
1.6.5.rc2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-25 12:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-25 12:22 [PATCH] virtio: order used ring after used index read Michael S. Tsirkin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-25 12:22 Michael S. Tsirkin

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.