* RE: Patch: Fix userland build failure in linux/if_tunnel.h
2009-11-02 10:57 ` Patch: Fix userland build failure in linux/if_tunnel.h Sergei Poselenov
@ 2009-11-02 11:15 ` Sledz, Steffen
2009-11-02 11:30 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sledz, Steffen @ 2009-11-02 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergei Poselenov; +Cc: wd, linux-kernel, netdev
Hello Sergei, hello other maintainers,
> > i'm working for the OpenEmbedded project and we hit the same busybox
> > problem you mentioned in <http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/31164/>.
> >
> > It doesn't look like you got much feedback on you patch suggestion.
> > Did it made it's way to the kernel sources? Or where there any
> > objections on it?
> Hm, I received a confirmation, that my fix was applied
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103860.html
No, i think it didn't. This confirmation is related to a patch from
Joe Perches to the MAINTAINERS file.
> However, it indeed didn't find their way into the mainline.
> I have no idea why, received no objections.
What are the maintainers saying?
Steffen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Patch: Fix userland build failure in linux/if_tunnel.h
2009-11-02 10:57 ` Patch: Fix userland build failure in linux/if_tunnel.h Sergei Poselenov
2009-11-02 11:15 ` Sledz, Steffen
@ 2009-11-02 11:30 ` David Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-11-02 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sposelenov; +Cc: sledz, sledz, wd, linux-kernel, netdev
From: Sergei Poselenov <sposelenov@emcraft.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:57:50 +0300
> Hm, I received a confirmation, that my fix was applied
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg103860.html
>
> However, it indeed didn't find their way into the mainline.
> I have no idea why, received no objections.
That posting doesn't say that your patch got applied, it says
that Joe Perches's MAINTAINERS file patch got applied.
Look at the context of what I'm replying to, rather than the
fact that you see "Applied." and it happens to be in a thread
you started with another patch.
Your patch is not necessary, current iproute2 sources compile
just fine without your change. iproute2 got changed to include
a local copy of linux/ip_tunnel.h which is modified so that it
compiles properly in userspace.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread