From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, harald.dunkel@t-online.de
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [Bugme-new] [Bug 14586] New: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get through
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112143913.3d89e4f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14586-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:28:00 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14586
>
> Summary: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get
> through
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.31.5
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: acme@ghostprotocols.net
> ReportedBy: harald.dunkel@t-online.de
> Regression: No
>
>
> I would like to run a bridge for kvm on a bonding interface (4 * 1Gbit, Intel
> e1000e). Problem: The DHCPDISCOVER packets sent by the guest show up on my dhcp
> server as expected, but the DHCPOFFER sent as a reply doesn't reach the guest
> behind the bridge.
>
> Using tcpdump on host and guest I can see the DHCPOFFER on the bond0 and br0
> interface, but it never shows up on vnet0 or on the guest's eth0.
>
> If I drop the bonding interface and use the host's eth2 for the bridge instead,
> then there is no such problem.
>
> Kernel on host and guest is 2.6.31.5. Attached you can find more information
> about my setup.
>
> I had sent this information to the linux kvm mailing list before, but consensus
> was that this is a bridging problem. See
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg25153.html
>
> There was no reply on the linux bridge mailing list, see
>
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2009-November/006749.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
harald.dunkel@t-online.de
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14586] New: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get through
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112143913.3d89e4f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14586-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:28:00 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14586
>
> Summary: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get
> through
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.31.5
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: acme@ghostprotocols.net
> ReportedBy: harald.dunkel@t-online.de
> Regression: No
>
>
> I would like to run a bridge for kvm on a bonding interface (4 * 1Gbit, Intel
> e1000e). Problem: The DHCPDISCOVER packets sent by the guest show up on my dhcp
> server as expected, but the DHCPOFFER sent as a reply doesn't reach the guest
> behind the bridge.
>
> Using tcpdump on host and guest I can see the DHCPOFFER on the bond0 and br0
> interface, but it never shows up on vnet0 or on the guest's eth0.
>
> If I drop the bonding interface and use the host's eth2 for the bridge instead,
> then there is no such problem.
>
> Kernel on host and guest is 2.6.31.5. Attached you can find more information
> about my setup.
>
> I had sent this information to the linux kvm mailing list before, but consensus
> was that this is a bridging problem. See
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg25153.html
>
> There was no reply on the linux bridge mailing list, see
>
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2009-November/006749.html
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-14586-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-11-12 22:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-11-12 22:39 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14586] New: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get through Andrew Morton
2009-11-12 22:55 ` [Bridge] " Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-12 22:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 3:23 ` [Bridge] " Andy Gospodarek
2009-11-13 3:23 ` Andy Gospodarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091112143913.3d89e4f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=harald.dunkel@t-online.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.