From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 04/52] [PATCH] fault handler performance optimization.
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:08:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113150909.764850273@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091113150824.351347652@de.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: 103-mm-fault-error.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 14180 bytes --]
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Slim down the do_exception function to handle only the fast path of a
fault and move the exceptional cases into a new function. That slightly
increases the performance of the fault handling.
Build fix for !CONFIG_COMPAT by
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 129 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
Index: quilt-2.6/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
===================================================================
--- quilt-2.6.orig/arch/s390/mm/fault.c 2009-11-13 16:08:12.000000000 +0100
+++ quilt-2.6/arch/s390/mm/fault.c 2009-11-13 16:08:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -34,16 +34,15 @@
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include <asm/s390_ext.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <asm/compat.h>
#include "../kernel/entry.h"
#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
#define __FAIL_ADDR_MASK 0x7ffff000
-#define __FIXUP_MASK 0x7fffffff
#define __SUBCODE_MASK 0x0200
#define __PF_RES_FIELD 0ULL
#else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
#define __FAIL_ADDR_MASK -4096L
-#define __FIXUP_MASK ~0L
#define __SUBCODE_MASK 0x0600
#define __PF_RES_FIELD 0x8000000000000000ULL
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
@@ -52,6 +51,10 @@
extern int sysctl_userprocess_debug;
#endif
+#define VM_FAULT_BADCONTEXT 0x010000
+#define VM_FAULT_BADMAP 0x020000
+#define VM_FAULT_BADACCESS 0x040000
+
static inline int notify_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -122,18 +125,22 @@
* Send SIGSEGV to task. This is an external routine
* to keep the stack usage of do_page_fault small.
*/
-static void do_sigsegv(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
- int si_code, unsigned long address)
+static noinline void do_sigsegv(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code,
+ int si_code, unsigned long trans_exc_code)
{
struct siginfo si;
+ unsigned long address;
+ address = trans_exc_code & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK;
+ current->thread.prot_addr = address;
+ current->thread.trap_no = int_code;
#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL) || defined(CONFIG_PROCESS_DEBUG)
#if defined(CONFIG_SYSCTL)
if (sysctl_userprocess_debug)
#endif
{
printk("User process fault: interruption code 0x%lX\n",
- error_code);
+ int_code);
printk("failing address: %lX\n", address);
show_regs(regs);
}
@@ -144,14 +151,14 @@
force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, &si, current);
}
-static void do_no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
- unsigned long trans_exc_code)
+static noinline void do_no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code,
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code)
{
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
unsigned long address;
/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
- fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->psw.addr & __FIXUP_MASK);
+ fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->psw.addr & PSW_ADDR_INSN);
if (fixup) {
regs->psw.addr = fixup->fixup | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
return;
@@ -169,107 +176,127 @@
printk(KERN_ALERT "Unable to handle kernel paging request"
" at virtual user address %p\n", (void *)address);
- die("Oops", regs, error_code);
+ die("Oops", regs, int_code);
do_exit(SIGKILL);
}
-static void do_low_address(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
- unsigned long trans_exc_code)
+static noinline void do_low_address(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code,
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code)
{
/* Low-address protection hit in kernel mode means
NULL pointer write access in kernel mode. */
if (regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
/* Low-address protection hit in user mode 'cannot happen'. */
- die ("Low-address protection", regs, error_code);
+ die ("Low-address protection", regs, int_code);
do_exit(SIGKILL);
}
- do_no_context(regs, error_code, trans_exc_code);
+ do_no_context(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
}
-static void do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
- unsigned long trans_exc_code)
+static noinline void do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code,
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
- struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
/*
* Send a sigbus, regardless of whether we were in kernel
* or user mode.
*/
tsk->thread.prot_addr = trans_exc_code & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK;
- tsk->thread.trap_no = error_code;
+ tsk->thread.trap_no = int_code;
force_sig(SIGBUS, tsk);
-
- /* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die */
- if (!(regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE))
- do_no_context(regs, error_code, trans_exc_code);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT
-static int signal_return(struct mm_struct *mm, struct pt_regs *regs,
- unsigned long address, unsigned long error_code)
+static noinline int signal_return(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code,
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code)
{
u16 instruction;
int rc;
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
- int compat;
-#endif
- pagefault_disable();
rc = __get_user(instruction, (u16 __user *) regs->psw.addr);
- pagefault_enable();
- if (rc)
- return -EFAULT;
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SINGLE_STEP);
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
- compat = is_compat_task();
- if (compat && instruction == 0x0a77)
- sys32_sigreturn();
- else if (compat && instruction == 0x0aad)
- sys32_rt_sigreturn();
- else
-#endif
- if (instruction == 0x0a77)
- sys_sigreturn();
- else if (instruction == 0x0aad)
- sys_rt_sigreturn();
- else {
- current->thread.prot_addr = address;
- current->thread.trap_no = error_code;
- do_sigsegv(regs, error_code, SEGV_MAPERR, address);
- }
+ if (!rc && instruction == 0x0a77) {
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SINGLE_STEP);
+ if (is_compat_task())
+ sys32_sigreturn();
+ else
+ sys_sigreturn();
+ } else if (!rc && instruction == 0x0aad) {
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SINGLE_STEP);
+ if (is_compat_task())
+ sys32_rt_sigreturn();
+ else
+ sys_rt_sigreturn();
+ } else
+ do_sigsegv(regs, int_code, SEGV_MAPERR, trans_exc_code);
return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT */
+static noinline void do_fault_error(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code,
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code, int fault)
+{
+ int si_code;
+
+ switch (fault) {
+ case VM_FAULT_BADACCESS:
+#ifdef CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT
+ if ((regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_ASC) == PSW_ASC_SECONDARY &&
+ (trans_exc_code & 3) == 0) {
+ signal_return(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
+ break;
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT */
+ case VM_FAULT_BADMAP:
+ /* Bad memory access. Check if it is kernel or user space. */
+ if (regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
+ /* User mode accesses just cause a SIGSEGV */
+ si_code = (fault == VM_FAULT_BADMAP) ?
+ SEGV_MAPERR : SEGV_ACCERR;
+ do_sigsegv(regs, int_code, si_code, trans_exc_code);
+ return;
+ }
+ case VM_FAULT_BADCONTEXT:
+ do_no_context(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
+ break;
+ default: /* fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR */
+ if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM)
+ pagefault_out_of_memory();
+ else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS) {
+ do_sigbus(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
+ /* Kernel mode? Handle exceptions or die */
+ if (!(regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE))
+ do_no_context(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
+ } else
+ BUG();
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
/*
* This routine handles page faults. It determines the address,
* and the problem, and then passes it off to one of the appropriate
* routines.
*
- * error_code:
+ * interruption code (int_code):
* 04 Protection -> Write-Protection (suprression)
* 10 Segment translation -> Not present (nullification)
* 11 Page translation -> Not present (nullification)
* 3b Region third trans. -> Not present (nullification)
*/
-static inline void
-do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, int write,
- unsigned long trans_exc_code)
+static inline int do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int write,
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code)
{
struct task_struct *tsk;
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
unsigned long address;
- int si_code;
int fault;
if (notify_page_fault(regs))
- return;
+ return 0;
tsk = current;
mm = tsk->mm;
@@ -279,8 +306,9 @@
* we are not in an interrupt and that there is a
* user context.
*/
+ fault = VM_FAULT_BADCONTEXT;
if (unlikely(!user_space_fault(trans_exc_code) || in_atomic() || !mm))
- goto no_context;
+ goto out;
address = trans_exc_code & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK;
/*
@@ -292,41 +320,35 @@
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, 0, regs, address);
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- si_code = SEGV_MAPERR;
+ fault = VM_FAULT_BADMAP;
vma = find_vma(mm, address);
if (!vma)
- goto bad_area;
+ goto out_up;
+ if (unlikely(vma->vm_start > address)) {
+ if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
+ goto out_up;
+ if (expand_stack(vma, address))
+ goto out_up;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Ok, we have a good vm_area for this memory access, so
+ * we can handle it..
+ */
+ fault = VM_FAULT_BADACCESS;
#ifdef CONFIG_S390_EXEC_PROTECT
if (unlikely((regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_ASC) == PSW_ASC_SECONDARY &&
(trans_exc_code & 3) == 0 && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)))
- if (!signal_return(mm, regs, address, error_code))
- /*
- * signal_return() has done an up_read(&mm->mmap_sem)
- * if it returns 0.
- */
- return;
+ goto out_up;
#endif
-
- if (vma->vm_start <= address)
- goto good_area;
- if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
- goto bad_area;
- if (expand_stack(vma, address))
- goto bad_area;
-/*
- * Ok, we have a good vm_area for this memory access, so
- * we can handle it..
- */
-good_area:
- si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
if (!write) {
/* page not present, check vm flags */
if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE)))
- goto bad_area;
+ goto out_up;
} else {
if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
- goto bad_area;
+ goto out_up;
}
if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
@@ -337,17 +359,9 @@
* the fault.
*/
fault = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, address, write ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0);
- if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR)) {
- if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM) {
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- pagefault_out_of_memory();
- return;
- } else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS) {
- do_sigbus(regs, error_code, address);
- return;
- }
- BUG();
- }
+ if (unlikely(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))
+ goto out_up;
+
if (fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR) {
tsk->maj_flt++;
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MAJ, 1, 0,
@@ -357,67 +371,55 @@
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_MIN, 1, 0,
regs, address);
}
- up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
/*
* The instruction that caused the program check will
* be repeated. Don't signal single step via SIGTRAP.
*/
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SINGLE_STEP);
- return;
-
-/*
- * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map..
- * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first..
- */
-bad_area:
+ fault = 0;
+out_up:
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-
- /* User mode accesses just cause a SIGSEGV */
- if (regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
- tsk->thread.prot_addr = address;
- tsk->thread.trap_no = error_code;
- do_sigsegv(regs, error_code, si_code, address);
- return;
- }
-
-no_context:
- do_no_context(regs, error_code, trans_exc_code);
+out:
+ return fault;
}
-void __kprobes do_protection_exception(struct pt_regs *regs,
- long error_code)
+void __kprobes do_protection_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code)
{
unsigned long trans_exc_code = S390_lowcore.trans_exc_code;
+ int fault;
/* Protection exception is supressing, decrement psw address. */
- regs->psw.addr -= (error_code >> 16);
+ regs->psw.addr -= (int_code >> 16);
/*
* Check for low-address protection. This needs to be treated
* as a special case because the translation exception code
* field is not guaranteed to contain valid data in this case.
*/
if (unlikely(!(trans_exc_code & 4))) {
- do_low_address(regs, error_code, trans_exc_code);
+ do_low_address(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
return;
}
- do_exception(regs, 4, 1, trans_exc_code);
+ fault = do_exception(regs, 1, trans_exc_code);
+ if (unlikely(fault))
+ do_fault_error(regs, 4, trans_exc_code, fault);
}
-void __kprobes do_dat_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
+void __kprobes do_dat_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code)
{
- do_exception(regs, error_code & 0xff, 0, S390_lowcore.trans_exc_code);
+ unsigned long trans_exc_code = S390_lowcore.trans_exc_code;
+ int fault;
+
+ fault = do_exception(regs, 0, trans_exc_code);
+ if (unlikely(fault))
+ do_fault_error(regs, int_code & 255, trans_exc_code, fault);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-void __kprobes do_asce_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
+void __kprobes do_asce_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, long int_code)
{
unsigned long trans_exc_code = S390_lowcore.trans_exc_code;
- struct mm_struct *mm;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- unsigned long address;
-
- mm = current->mm;
- address = trans_exc_code & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK;
if (unlikely(!user_space_fault(trans_exc_code) || in_atomic() || !mm))
goto no_context;
@@ -425,7 +427,7 @@
local_irq_enable();
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
- vma = find_vma(mm, address);
+ vma = find_vma(mm, trans_exc_code & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK);
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
if (vma) {
@@ -435,14 +437,12 @@
/* User mode accesses just cause a SIGSEGV */
if (regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
- current->thread.prot_addr = address;
- current->thread.trap_no = error_code;
- do_sigsegv(regs, error_code, SEGV_MAPERR, address);
+ do_sigsegv(regs, int_code, SEGV_MAPERR, trans_exc_code);
return;
}
no_context:
- do_no_context(regs, error_code, trans_exc_code);
+ do_no_context(regs, int_code, trans_exc_code);
}
#endif
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@
: : "a" (&refbk), "m" (refbk) : "cc");
}
-static void pfault_interrupt(__u16 error_code)
+static void pfault_interrupt(__u16 int_code)
{
struct task_struct *tsk;
__u16 subcode;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 15:08 [patch 00/52] s390 patches for the next merge window (2.6.33) Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 01/52] [PATCH] Improve address space check Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 02/52] [PATCH] Improve address space mode selection Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 03/52] [PATCH] Improve notify_page_fault implementation Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 05/52] [PATCH] fault handler access flags check Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 06/52] [PATCH] Use do_exception() in pagetable walk usercopy functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 07/52] [PATCH] Improve code generated by atomic operations Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 08/52] [PATCH] dasd: support DIAG access for read-only devices Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 09/52] [PATCH] cmm: free pages on hibernate Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 10/52] [PATCH] smp: remove unused typedef and defines Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 11/52] [PATCH] dasd: remove dead code Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 12/52] [PATCH] use generic termbits.h header file Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 13/52] [PATCH] use generic sockios.h " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 14/52] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add s390 drivers block Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 15/52] [PATCH] zcrypt: initialize ap_messages for cex3 exploitation Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 16/52] [PATCH] zcrypt: special command support " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 17/52] [PATCH] zcrypt: add support for cex3 device types Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 18/52] [PATCH] zcrypt: use definitions for cex3 Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 19/52] [PATCH] zcrypt: adjust speed rating between cex2 and pcixcc Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 20/52] [PATCH] zcrypt: adjust speed rating of cex3 adapters Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 21/52] [PATCH] dasd: enable prefix independent of pav support Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 22/52] [PATCH] dasd: improve error recovery for internal I/O Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 23/52] [PATCH] dasd: remove strings from s390dbf Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 24/52] [PATCH] s390: use change recording override for kernel mapping Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 25/52] [PATCH] sclp: improve servicability setting Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 26/52] [PATCH] cio: fix double free in case of probe failure Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 27/52] [PATCH] cio: fix repeat setting of cdev parent association Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 28/52] [PATCH] cio: introduce parent-initiated device move Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 29/52] [PATCH] cio: introduce subchannel todos Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 30/52] [PATCH] cio: introduce ccw device todos Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 31/52] [PATCH] cio: inform user when online/offline processing fails Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 32/52] [PATCH] cio: handle error during device recognition consistently Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 33/52] [PATCH] cio: handle error during path verification consistently Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 34/52] [PATCH] cio: ensure proper locking during device recognition Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:08 ` [patch 35/52] [PATCH] cio: dont panic in non-fatal conditions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 36/52] [PATCH] cio: consistent infrastructure for internal I/O requests Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 37/52] [PATCH] cio: use ccw request infrastructure for sense id Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 38/52] [PATCH] cio: use ccw request infrastructure for pgid Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 39/52] [PATCH] cio: allow setting not-operational devices offline Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 40/52] [PATCH] cio: remove intretry flag Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 41/52] [PATCH] cio: split PGID settings and status Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 42/52] [PATCH] cio: use sense-pgid operation for path verification Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 43/52] [PATCH] cio: make steal lock procedure more robust Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 44/52] [PATCH] cio: remove registered flag from ccw_device_private Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 45/52] [PATCH] cio: add per device initialization status flag Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 46/52] [PATCH] cio: fix quiesce state Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 47/52] [PATCH] cio: handle failed disable_subchannel after device recognition Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 48/52] [PATCH] cio: handle busy subchannel in ccw_device_move_to_sch Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 49/52] [PATCH] cio: quiesce subchannel in io_subchannel_remove Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 50/52] [PATCH] cio: change locking " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 51/52] [PATCH] cio: improve error recovery for internal I/Os Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:09 ` [patch 52/52] [PATCH] cio: dont unregister a busy device in ccw_device_set_offline Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-13 15:28 ` [patch 00/52] s390 patches for the next merge window (2.6.33) Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-13 15:31 ` s390: move keyboard compat ioctls into tty3270 driver Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-16 8:33 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113150909.764850273@de.ibm.com \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.