From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow memory hotplug and hibernation in the same kernel
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:51:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113155102.3480907f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113105944.GA16028@basil.fritz.box>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:59:44 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Allow memory hotplug and hibernation in the same kernel
>
> Memory hotplug and hibernation was excluded in Kconfig. This is obviously
> a problem for distribution kernels who want to support both in the same
> image.
>
> After some discussions with Rafael and others the only problem is
> with parallel memory hotadd or removal while a hibernation operation
> is in process. It was also working for s390 before.
>
> This patch removes the Kconfig level exclusion, and simply
> makes the memory add / remove functions grab the pm_mutex
> to exclude against hibernation.
>
> ...
>
> +extern struct mutex pm_mutex;
Am a bit worried by the new mutex.
> #ifndef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> static inline void register_nosave_region(unsigned long b, unsigned long e)
> {
> @@ -308,8 +310,23 @@ static inline void register_nosave_regio
> static inline void register_nosave_region_late(unsigned long b, unsigned long e)
> {
> }
> -#endif
>
> -extern struct mutex pm_mutex;
> +static inline void lock_hibernation(void) {}
> +static inline void unlock_hibernation(void) {}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +/* Let some subsystems like memory hotadd exclude hibernation */
> +
> +static inline void lock_hibernation(void)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unlock_hibernation(void)
> +{
> + mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +}
> +#endif
Has this been carefully reviewed and lockdep-tested to ensure that we
didn't introduce any ab/ba nasties?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow memory hotplug and hibernation in the same kernel
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:51:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113155102.3480907f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113105944.GA16028@basil.fritz.box>
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:59:44 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> Allow memory hotplug and hibernation in the same kernel
>
> Memory hotplug and hibernation was excluded in Kconfig. This is obviously
> a problem for distribution kernels who want to support both in the same
> image.
>
> After some discussions with Rafael and others the only problem is
> with parallel memory hotadd or removal while a hibernation operation
> is in process. It was also working for s390 before.
>
> This patch removes the Kconfig level exclusion, and simply
> makes the memory add / remove functions grab the pm_mutex
> to exclude against hibernation.
>
> ...
>
> +extern struct mutex pm_mutex;
Am a bit worried by the new mutex.
> #ifndef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> static inline void register_nosave_region(unsigned long b, unsigned long e)
> {
> @@ -308,8 +310,23 @@ static inline void register_nosave_regio
> static inline void register_nosave_region_late(unsigned long b, unsigned long e)
> {
> }
> -#endif
>
> -extern struct mutex pm_mutex;
> +static inline void lock_hibernation(void) {}
> +static inline void unlock_hibernation(void) {}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +/* Let some subsystems like memory hotadd exclude hibernation */
> +
> +static inline void lock_hibernation(void)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unlock_hibernation(void)
> +{
> + mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
> +}
> +#endif
Has this been carefully reviewed and lockdep-tested to ensure that we
didn't introduce any ab/ba nasties?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 10:59 [PATCH] Allow memory hotplug and hibernation in the same kernel Andi Kleen
2009-11-13 10:59 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-13 11:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-13 11:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-13 11:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-13 11:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-13 11:36 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-13 11:36 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-13 11:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-13 11:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-13 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-13 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-14 0:15 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-14 0:15 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-14 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-14 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-13 23:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-11-13 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-14 0:08 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-14 0:08 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113155102.3480907f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.