All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make crypto unplug fix V3
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:29:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113202907.GP29804@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113184004.GA11332@think>

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:40:04PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:34:46PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 07:58:12AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > This is still likely to set your dm data on fire.  It is only meant for
> > > testers that start with mkfs and don't have any valuable dm data.
> > > 
> > 
> > The good news is that my room remains fire-free. Despite swap also
> > running from dm-crypt, I had no corruption or instability issues.
> 
> Ok, definitely not so convincing I'd try and shove it into a late rc.
> 
> > 
> > Here is an updated set of results for fake-gitk running.
> > 
> > X86
> > 2.6.30-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:12:08.908    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:10:56.283    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:11:51.653    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30            Elapsed:12:26.587    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000123-congestion-both           Elapsed:10:55.298    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck      Elapsed:18:01.523    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:10:45.720    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-revert-8aa7e847                   Elapsed:15:08.020    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000000-force-highorder       Elapsed:16:20.765    Failures:4
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:13:42.920    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30        Elapsed:16:13.380    Failures:1
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000123-congestion-both       Elapsed:18:39.118    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck  Elapsed:15:04.398    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:12:50.438    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-revert-8aa7e847               Elapsed:20:50.888    Failures:0
> > 
> > X86-64
> > 2.6.30-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:10:37.300    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:08:49.338    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:09:37.840    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30            Elapsed:15:49.690    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000123-congestion-both           Elapsed:09:18.790    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck      Elapsed:08:39.268    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:08:20.965    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-revert-8aa7e847                   Elapsed:08:07.457    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000000-force-highorder       Elapsed:18:29.103    Failures:1
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:25:53.515    Failures:3
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30        Elapsed:19:55.570    Failures:6
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000123-congestion-both       Elapsed:17:29.255    Failures:2
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck  Elapsed:14:41.068    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:15:48.028    Failures:1
> > 2.6.32-rc6-revert-8aa7e847               Elapsed:14:48.647    Failures:0
> > 
> > The numbering in the kernel indicates what patches are applied. I tested
> > the dm-crypt patch both in isolation and in combination with the patches
> > in this series.
> > 
> > Basically, the dm-crypt-unplug makes a small difference in performance
> > overall, mostly slight gains and losses. There was one massive regression
> > with the dm-crypt patch applied to 2.6.32-rc6 but at the moment, I don't
> > know what that is.
> 
> How consistent are your numbers between runs?  I was trying to match
> this up with your last email and things were pretty different.
> 

The figures from the first mail were based on kernels that were not
instrumented. It so happened that this run was based on an instrumented
kernel to get the congestion_wait figures so the results are different.

However, the results vary a lot. In some cases, it will spike just as
2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug did. The reported figure is the
average of 4 fake-gitk runs. I don't have the standard deviation handy
but it's high.

> > 
> > In general, the patch reduces the amount of time direct reclaimers are
> > spending on congestion_wait.
> > 
> > > It includes my patch from last night, along with changes to force dm to
> > > unplug when its IO queues empty.
> > > 
> > > The problem goes like this:
> > > 
> > > Process: submit read bio
> > > dm: put bio onto work queue
> > > process: unplug
> > > dm: work queue finds bio, does a generic_make_request
> > > 
> > > The end result is that we miss the unplug completely.  dm-crypt needs to
> > > unplug for sync bios.  This patch also changes it to unplug whenever the
> > > queue is empty, which is far from ideal but better than missing the
> > > unplugs.
> > > 
> > > This doesn't completely fix io stalls I'm seeing with dm-crypt, but its
> > > my best guess.  If it works, I'll break it up and submit for real to
> > > the dm people.
> > > 
> > 
> > Out of curiousity, how are you measuring IO stalls? In the tests I'm doing,
> > the worker processes output their progress and it should be at a steady
> > rate. I considered a stall to be an excessive delay between updates which
> > is a pretty indirect measure.
> 
> I just setup a crypto disk and did dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/foo bs=1M
> 
> If you watch vmstat 1, there's supposed to be a constant steam of IO to
> the disk.  If a whole second goes by with zero IO, we're doing something
> wrong, I get a number of multi-second stalls where we are just waiting
> for IO to happen.
> 

Ok, cool.

> Most of the time I was able to catch a sysrq-w for it, someone was
> waiting on a read to finish.   It isn't completely clear to me if the
> unplugging is working properly.
> 

The machines I'm using are now tied up doing the same tests with dm-crypt
and then I need to rerun with dm-crypt with the changed patches. It'll be
early next week before the machines free up again for me to investigate your
patch more but initial results look promising at least.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de>,
	Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com>,
	Tobias Oetiker <tobi@oetiker.ch>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make crypto unplug fix V3
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:29:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113202907.GP29804@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113184004.GA11332@think>

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:40:04PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:34:46PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 07:58:12AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > This is still likely to set your dm data on fire.  It is only meant for
> > > testers that start with mkfs and don't have any valuable dm data.
> > > 
> > 
> > The good news is that my room remains fire-free. Despite swap also
> > running from dm-crypt, I had no corruption or instability issues.
> 
> Ok, definitely not so convincing I'd try and shove it into a late rc.
> 
> > 
> > Here is an updated set of results for fake-gitk running.
> > 
> > X86
> > 2.6.30-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:12:08.908    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:10:56.283    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:11:51.653    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30            Elapsed:12:26.587    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000123-congestion-both           Elapsed:10:55.298    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck      Elapsed:18:01.523    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:10:45.720    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-revert-8aa7e847                   Elapsed:15:08.020    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000000-force-highorder       Elapsed:16:20.765    Failures:4
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:13:42.920    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30        Elapsed:16:13.380    Failures:1
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000123-congestion-both       Elapsed:18:39.118    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck  Elapsed:15:04.398    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:12:50.438    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-revert-8aa7e847               Elapsed:20:50.888    Failures:0
> > 
> > X86-64
> > 2.6.30-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:10:37.300    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000000-force-highorder           Elapsed:08:49.338    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:09:37.840    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30            Elapsed:15:49.690    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0000123-congestion-both           Elapsed:09:18.790    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck      Elapsed:08:39.268    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug           Elapsed:08:20.965    Failures:0
> > 2.6.31-revert-8aa7e847                   Elapsed:08:07.457    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000000-force-highorder       Elapsed:18:29.103    Failures:1
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:25:53.515    Failures:3
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000012-pgalloc-2.6.30        Elapsed:19:55.570    Failures:6
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0000123-congestion-both       Elapsed:17:29.255    Failures:2
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0001234-kswapd-quick-recheck  Elapsed:14:41.068    Failures:0
> > 2.6.32-rc6-0123456-dm-crypt-unplug       Elapsed:15:48.028    Failures:1
> > 2.6.32-rc6-revert-8aa7e847               Elapsed:14:48.647    Failures:0
> > 
> > The numbering in the kernel indicates what patches are applied. I tested
> > the dm-crypt patch both in isolation and in combination with the patches
> > in this series.
> > 
> > Basically, the dm-crypt-unplug makes a small difference in performance
> > overall, mostly slight gains and losses. There was one massive regression
> > with the dm-crypt patch applied to 2.6.32-rc6 but at the moment, I don't
> > know what that is.
> 
> How consistent are your numbers between runs?  I was trying to match
> this up with your last email and things were pretty different.
> 

The figures from the first mail were based on kernels that were not
instrumented. It so happened that this run was based on an instrumented
kernel to get the congestion_wait figures so the results are different.

However, the results vary a lot. In some cases, it will spike just as
2.6.32-rc6-0000006-dm-crypt-unplug did. The reported figure is the
average of 4 fake-gitk runs. I don't have the standard deviation handy
but it's high.

> > 
> > In general, the patch reduces the amount of time direct reclaimers are
> > spending on congestion_wait.
> > 
> > > It includes my patch from last night, along with changes to force dm to
> > > unplug when its IO queues empty.
> > > 
> > > The problem goes like this:
> > > 
> > > Process: submit read bio
> > > dm: put bio onto work queue
> > > process: unplug
> > > dm: work queue finds bio, does a generic_make_request
> > > 
> > > The end result is that we miss the unplug completely.  dm-crypt needs to
> > > unplug for sync bios.  This patch also changes it to unplug whenever the
> > > queue is empty, which is far from ideal but better than missing the
> > > unplugs.
> > > 
> > > This doesn't completely fix io stalls I'm seeing with dm-crypt, but its
> > > my best guess.  If it works, I'll break it up and submit for real to
> > > the dm people.
> > > 
> > 
> > Out of curiousity, how are you measuring IO stalls? In the tests I'm doing,
> > the worker processes output their progress and it should be at a steady
> > rate. I considered a stall to be an excessive delay between updates which
> > is a pretty indirect measure.
> 
> I just setup a crypto disk and did dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/foo bs=1M
> 
> If you watch vmstat 1, there's supposed to be a constant steam of IO to
> the disk.  If a whole second goes by with zero IO, we're doing something
> wrong, I get a number of multi-second stalls where we are just waiting
> for IO to happen.
> 

Ok, cool.

> Most of the time I was able to catch a sysrq-w for it, someone was
> waiting on a read to finish.   It isn't completely clear to me if the
> unplugging is working properly.
> 

The machines I'm using are now tied up doing the same tests with dm-crypt
and then I need to rerun with dm-crypt with the changed patches. It'll be
early next week before the machines free up again for me to investigate your
patch more but initial results look promising at least.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-13 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-12 19:30 [PATCH 0/7] Reduce GFP_ATOMIC allocation failures, candidate fix V3 Mel Gorman
2009-11-12 19:30 ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-12 19:30 ` Mel Gorman
     [not found] ` <1258054211-2854-1-git-send-email-mel-wPRd99KPJ+uzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-12 19:30   ` [PATCH 1/5] page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed Mel Gorman
2009-11-12 19:30     ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-12 19:30     ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-12 20:27 ` [PATCH 0/7] Reduce GFP_ATOMIC allocation failures, candidate fix V3 Chris Mason
2009-11-12 20:27   ` Chris Mason
2009-11-12 22:00   ` Chris Mason
2009-11-12 22:00   ` Chris Mason
2009-11-12 22:00     ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13  2:46     ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13  2:46     ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13  2:46       ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13 12:58       ` [PATCH] make crypto unplug " Chris Mason
2009-11-13 12:58       ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13 12:58         ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13 17:34         ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 17:34         ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 17:34           ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 17:34           ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 18:40           ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13 18:40             ` Chris Mason
2009-11-13 20:29             ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-11-13 20:29               ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 20:29             ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-16 16:44       ` [PATCH 0/7] Reduce GFP_ATOMIC allocation failures, candidate " Milan Broz
2009-11-16 16:44       ` Milan Broz
2009-11-16 16:44         ` Milan Broz
2009-11-16 16:44         ` Milan Broz
2009-11-16 18:36         ` Chris Mason
2009-11-16 18:36           ` Chris Mason
2009-11-19  8:12           ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-19  8:12             ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-19  8:12           ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-19  8:12           ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-16 16:44       ` Milan Broz
2009-11-13 13:44     ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 13:44     ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 13:44       ` Mel Gorman
2009-11-13 13:44       ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091113202907.GP29804@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=elendil@planet.nl \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=karol.k.lewandowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=tobi@oetiker.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.