From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext2: clear uptodate flag on super block I/O error
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:04:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091116160449.3fc5e958@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091113150719.9d31dde2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This fixes a WARN backtrace in mark_buffer_dirty() that occurs during
unmount when a USB or floppy device is removed. I reported this a kernel
regression, but looks like it might have been there for longer
than that.
The super block update from a previous operation has marked the buffer
as in error, and the flag has to be cleared before doing the update.
(Similar code already exists in ext4).
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--- a/fs/ext2/super.c 2009-11-16 15:55:36.399078475 -0800
+++ b/fs/ext2/super.c 2009-11-16 15:59:49.814765923 -0800
@@ -1121,8 +1121,20 @@ static void ext2_sync_super(struct super
static int ext2_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
struct ext2_super_block *es = EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es;
+ struct buffer_head *sbh = EXT2_SB(sb)->s_sbh;
lock_kernel();
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
+ /*
+ * This happens if USB or floppy device is yanked out.
+ * Maybe user put device back in so warn and update again.
+ */
+ printk(KERN_ERR
+ "EXT2-fs: previous I/O error to superblock detected\n");
+ clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
+ set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
+ }
+
if (es->s_state & cpu_to_le16(EXT2_VALID_FS)) {
ext2_debug("setting valid to 0\n");
es->s_state &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT2_VALID_FS);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 20:33 Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31 Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-11 21:34 ` Frans Pop
2009-11-11 22:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 22:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-13 23:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-17 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-11-17 2:08 ` [PATCH] ext2: clear uptodate flag on super block I/O error Nick Piggin
2009-11-17 17:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-14 13:18 ` Mount -o sync regression in 2.6.31 Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091116160449.3fc5e958@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.