From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings-s/n/eUQHGBpZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Mika Kuoppala
<mika.kuoppala-xNZwKgViW5gAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Shared i2c adapter locking
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:35:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117103554.03971b2f@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117193313.b750804e.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:33:13 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:07:15 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Presumably this is meant for net-next-2.6, and you'll implement
> >
> > Actually I meant to push this to Linus immediately, through my i2c
> > tree. This is essentially a no-op: the binary code will be the same as
> > before the patch, so guaranteed to be safe, and this will solve
> > conflicts in linux-next.
>
> Any word on this?
Haven't you read this:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg07839.html
and the 3 following posts?
If you did and something is still not clear, please let me know. My
understanding is that the action token is in David's hands now.
--
Jean Delvare
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@nokia.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Shared i2c adapter locking
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:35:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117103554.03971b2f@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117193313.b750804e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:33:13 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:07:15 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Presumably this is meant for net-next-2.6, and you'll implement
> >
> > Actually I meant to push this to Linus immediately, through my i2c
> > tree. This is essentially a no-op: the binary code will be the same as
> > before the patch, so guaranteed to be safe, and this will solve
> > conflicts in linux-next.
>
> Any word on this?
Haven't you read this:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg07839.html
and the 3 following posts?
If you did and something is still not clear, please let me know. My
understanding is that the action token is in David's hands now.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-26 2:37 linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-26 2:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-26 13:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-10-29 14:43 ` Shared i2c adapter locking (Was: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the i2c tree) Jean Delvare
2009-10-29 14:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-10-29 15:09 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-11-05 13:11 ` Shared i2c adapter locking Jean Delvare
2009-11-05 13:11 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-05 13:57 ` Ben Hutchings
[not found] ` <1257429444.2793.2.camel-xQnnTUlwzDrdvaEqJLTMTA9jg9n5Vt1AMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-05 14:07 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-05 14:07 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-17 8:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20091117193313.b750804e.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-17 9:35 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-11-17 9:35 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-17 11:51 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 13:32 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-11-17 14:13 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20091117103554.03971b2f-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-17 20:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-17 20:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <20091118075917.9ac0248c.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-19 6:53 ` David Miller
2009-11-19 6:53 ` David Miller
2009-11-19 7:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-10 11:42 ` linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the i2c tree Jean Delvare
2009-11-10 11:42 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-10 13:22 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-11-10 15:02 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-10 15:10 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091117103554.03971b2f@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhutchings-s/n/eUQHGBpZroRs9YW3xA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala-xNZwKgViW5gAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.