From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Torsten Fleischer <to-fleischer@t-online.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: spi_mpc8xxx.c: chip select polarity problem
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:28:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117232823.GA19058@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117202211.GB27574@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:22:11PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:09:28PM +0100, Torsten Fleischer wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 19:00PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > So it might be better to fix up initial value in the platform code?
> > >
> > > Oh, we actually cannot, because the driver calls
> > > gpio_direction_output().
> > >
> > > And since we don't know the mode prior to SPI device's driver
> > > probe() finished, we'll have to set up an initial state in the
> > > first SPI transfer. I.e. something like this:
> >
> > In most cases the device drivers perform SPI transfers already in their
> > probe() function. How can it be ensured that the CS of all other devices are
> > inactive even if they are not initialized at that time?
>
> Good question. Oh, well... then we have to use spi-cs-high,
> no matter that it is a duplication of the 'compatible' property.
> SPI bus drivers don't know all the devices and their CS level,
> and so spi-cs-high is the only way to tell that information. :-(
Oh. On the other hand, we can postpone the gpio_direction_output()
call, and still require that the platform code (or firmware)
should be responsible for setting a sane default values on the
chip selects.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 16:42 spi_mpc8xxx.c: chip select polarity problem Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-16 17:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-16 18:00 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-17 20:09 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-17 20:22 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-17 23:28 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-11-18 16:20 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-18 23:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-21 8:45 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-21 16:08 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-25 0:33 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-25 20:41 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-25 22:11 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-25 22:11 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 12:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 12:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 17:27 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-26 18:18 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:18 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:16 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:16 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 18:50 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:50 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 19:01 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 19:01 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 19:17 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 19:17 ` Grant Likely
2009-12-09 15:49 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-12-09 17:46 ` Grant Likely
2009-12-09 19:13 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-12-14 16:54 ` Torsten Fleischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091117232823.GA19058@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=to-fleischer@t-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.