From: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Cc: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Don't pass filename in multiboot command line
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:21:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124112101.GA20451@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7ead6de0908140820i4898ed36v4be0dd2ad7b7c8d8@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1428 bytes --]
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:20:09PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Committed with improvements as ACK'ed by Robert on IRC
I wasted at least half of a working day due to this change! (As well as
others wasted time, who where trying to help me.)
Don't get me wrong -- in principle I agree with this change, but what I
do not agree with is simply, silently! changing this behavior: you know,
there are systems that rely on the previous behavior, such as GNU/Hurd,
or the issue I was struggling with, Xen, as reported in this thread,
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/2009-October/002479.html>,
and finally here: <http://bugs.debian.org/557645>.
I have been looking in a lot of places (initramsfs, udev, lvm, ...) what
was possibly going wrong, but would not have expected that GRUB's module
would suddenly change its behavior. Heck, I'm even on the grub-devel
mailing list, but I can't afford to read its hundreds of messages every
week.
``There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.'' of course, but
please think about the consequences before doing such incompatible
changes in the future.
Wouldn't it have been possible to use something like ``module --arg0 FILE
ARG0 ARG1 ...'', and ``module FILE ARG1 ...'' defaulting to ``module
--arg0 FILE FILE ARG1 ...''?
Regards,
Thomas
PS: In general, thanks for the work all of you are doing with maintaining
GRUB!
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-01 13:23 [RFC] Don't pass filename in multiboot command line Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2009-08-01 14:34 ` Robert Millan
2009-08-01 14:37 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2009-08-01 15:05 ` Robert Millan
2009-08-01 15:13 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2009-08-02 21:38 ` Robert Millan
2009-08-02 21:42 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2009-08-02 22:41 ` Robert Millan
2009-08-14 15:20 ` Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
2009-08-27 1:58 ` Seth Goldberg
2009-08-27 2:38 ` Seth Goldberg
2009-08-27 10:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2009-08-28 12:51 ` Robert Millan
2009-11-24 11:21 ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2009-11-24 11:34 ` Robert Millan
2009-11-24 11:48 ` Robert Millan
2009-11-24 13:02 ` Samuel Thibault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091124112101.GA20451@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=tschwinge@gnu.org \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=phcoder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.