* [Buildroot] Build failure - sysstat-9.0.5
@ 2009-11-29 1:49 Michael S. Zick
2009-11-29 8:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Zick @ 2009-11-29 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
This one might be fixable since the mentioned missing
items are supposed to be built -
make[1]: *** [mpstat] Error 1
sadc.o: In function `p_write_error':
sadc.c:(.text+0x120): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
sadc.o: In function `usage':
sadc.c:(.text+0x1a0): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
sadc.c:(.text+0x1dc): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
sadc.o: In function `setup_file_hdr':
sadc.c:(.text+0x1000): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
sadc.o: In function `create_sa_file':
sadc.c:(.text+0x1230): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
sadc.o:sadc.c:(.text+0x15d0): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow
libsyscom.a(common.o): In function `init_nls':
common.c:(.text+0x994): undefined reference to `libintl_bindtextdomain'
common.c:(.text+0x9ac): undefined reference to `libintl_textdomain'
libsyscom.a(common.o): In function `print_version':
common.c:(.text+0x12b8): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
libsyscom.a(ioconf.o): In function `transform_devmapname':
ioconf.c:(.text+0x1f0): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [sadc] Error 1
iostat.o: In function `usage':
iostat.c:(.text+0x16fc): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
iostat.c:(.text+0x1738): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
iostat.o: In function `read_proc_stat':
iostat.c:(.text+0x3120): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
librdstats.a(rd_stats.o): In function `get_proc_cpu_nr':
rd_stats.c:(.text+0x37d8): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
librdstats.a(rd_stats.o): In function `read_stat_cpu':
rd_stats.c:(.text+0x3cbc): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
librdstats.a(rd_stats.o):rd_stats.c:(.text+0x3f44): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow
libsyscom.a(common.o): In function `init_nls':
common.c:(.text+0x994): undefined reference to `libintl_bindtextdomain'
common.c:(.text+0x9ac): undefined reference to `libintl_textdomain'
libsyscom.a(common.o): In function `print_version':
common.c:(.text+0x12b8): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
libsyscom.a(ioconf.o): In function `transform_devmapname':
ioconf.c:(.text+0x1f0): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [iostat] Error 1
make: *** [/Builds/BLDRT/br-head/output/build/sysstat-9.0.5/.stamp_built] Error 2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Build failure - sysstat-9.0.5
2009-11-29 1:49 [Buildroot] Build failure - sysstat-9.0.5 Michael S. Zick
@ 2009-11-29 8:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-11-29 8:56 ` Michael S. Zick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2009-11-29 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
Hi Michael,
Le Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:49:42 -0600,
"Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org> a ?crit :
> This one might be fixable since the mentioned missing
> items are supposed to be built -
Thank you for all your tests.
Wouldn't it be better to fill bug reports in our bug tracking system
(http://bugs.uclibc.org) ? Mails to the list are nice, but it's harder
to keep track of what has been solved, what hasn't been solved.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Build failure - sysstat-9.0.5
2009-11-29 8:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2009-11-29 8:56 ` Michael S. Zick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Zick @ 2009-11-29 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: buildroot
On Sun November 29 2009, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Le Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:49:42 -0600,
> "Michael S. Zick" <minimod@morethan.org> a ?crit :
>
> > This one might be fixable since the mentioned missing
> > items are supposed to be built -
>
> Thank you for all your tests.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to fill bug reports in our bug tracking system
> (http://bugs.uclibc.org) ? Mails to the list are nice, but it's harder
> to keep track of what has been solved, what hasn't been solved.
>
Better for who?
The submitter or the submittie?
Working through that bug submit form/process just drops the information
into a black hole as far as the submitter can tell.
It might be a great organizational tool at the submittie end, where
being able to tag/track e-mail reports could be a pain.
But back at the submitter side = zip, zero, nada feedback to be able
to even tell if the report went into the bit bucket somewhere -
At least by e-mail, I get feedback, even the: "you screwed the options"
helps a lot.
So if you happen to read one of these mails and feel it is a problem that
will take a long enough time to solve that it might "get lost" please
feel free to assign it a bug-report number if the bug-tracker.
Mike
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-29 8:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-29 1:49 [Buildroot] Build failure - sysstat-9.0.5 Michael S. Zick
2009-11-29 8:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2009-11-29 8:56 ` Michael S. Zick
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.