From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
JosephChan@via.com.tw, Scott Fang <ScottFang@viatech.com.cn>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:43:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091213114343.a60828d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B24E3AB.9040609@gmx.de>
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:52:59 +0100 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Julia, Andrew,
>
> Julia Lawall schrieb:
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >
> > sizeof(viafb_gamma_table) is just the size of the pointer. This is changed
> > to the size used when calling kmalloc to initialize the pointer.
>
> this is the second patch addressing this issue ending up in my mailbox.
> At least this one is technically correct so feel free to upstream it.
> However I vote for removing this ioctl hell from viafb as most of them
> duplicate framebuffer functionality or have unknown (not clearly
> defined) functionality or at least solve a generic problem with a custom
> ioctl (which I consider bad). I had a patch ready to move this stuff to
> an extra file and print a warning that it is subject to be removed. I
> feel a bit uncomfortable about repairing broken stuff prior to removing it.
> Any comments on this subject?
>
I favour both repairing and removing broken stuff ;)
We may as well fix it if problems are known. Perhaps someone is
hitting the problem at runtime in an older kernel and needs a patch to
backport. Perhaps we later decide to revert the removal, thus
reinstating the known bug.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
JosephChan@via.com.tw, Scott Fang <ScottFang@viatech.com.cn>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a pointer
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:43:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091213114343.a60828d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B24E3AB.9040609@gmx.de>
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:52:59 +0100 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Julia, Andrew,
>
> Julia Lawall schrieb:
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >
> > sizeof(viafb_gamma_table) is just the size of the pointer. This is changed
> > to the size used when calling kmalloc to initialize the pointer.
>
> this is the second patch addressing this issue ending up in my mailbox.
> At least this one is technically correct so feel free to upstream it.
> However I vote for removing this ioctl hell from viafb as most of them
> duplicate framebuffer functionality or have unknown (not clearly
> defined) functionality or at least solve a generic problem with a custom
> ioctl (which I consider bad). I had a patch ready to move this stuff to
> an extra file and print a warning that it is subject to be removed. I
> feel a bit uncomfortable about repairing broken stuff prior to removing it.
> Any comments on this subject?
>
I favour both repairing and removing broken stuff ;)
We may as well fix it if problems are known. Perhaps someone is
hitting the problem at runtime in an older kernel and needs a patch to
backport. Perhaps we later decide to revert the removal, thus
reinstating the known bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-13 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-13 11:42 [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a pointer Julia Lawall
2009-12-13 11:42 ` Julia Lawall
2009-12-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a Florian Tobias Schandinat
2009-12-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a pointer Florian Tobias Schandinat
2009-12-13 19:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-12-13 19:43 ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a Florian Tobias Schandinat
2009-12-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 7/9] drivers/video: Correct code taking the size of a pointer Florian Tobias Schandinat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091213114343.a60828d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de \
--cc=JosephChan@via.com.tw \
--cc=ScottFang@viatech.com.cn \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.