* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] wireshark-batman-adv: Displaying issue with vis-packets
@ 2009-12-13 20:31 Linus Lüssing
2009-12-14 0:26 ` Sven Eckelmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Lüssing @ 2009-12-13 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]
The second originator field of a vis client update packet looks a
bit odd in wireshark. Sven :)? (have a look at the attached
cap-file for an example)
I was also wondering about renaming this field maybe, in the
beginning I got quite confused by seeing two identical originator
fields in most vis packets. Maybe it should be renamed to previous
sender or forwarding originator instead?
Cheers, Linus
[-- Attachment #1.2: batman-adv-vis.cap --]
[-- Type: application/cap, Size: 211 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-14 0:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-13 20:31 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] wireshark-batman-adv: Displaying issue with vis-packets Linus Lüssing
2009-12-14 0:26 ` Sven Eckelmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.