From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
lwoodman@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
minchan.kim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Mark sleep_on as deprecated
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:04:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091214080452.18516dc1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091214130302.GA25797@infradead.org>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:03:02 -0500
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:24:40PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> >
> > sleep_on() function is SMP and/or kernel preemption unsafe. we
> > shouldn't use it on new code.
>
> And the best way to archive this is to remove the function.
>
> In Linus' current tree I find:
>
> - 5 instances of sleep_on(), all in old and obscure block drivers
> - 2 instances of sleep_on_timeout(), both in old and obscure drivers
these should both die; the sleep_on() ones using BROKEN in Kconfig..
.. sleep_on() has not worked in the 2.6 series ever.... ;)
>
> - 28 instances of interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(), mostly in obscure
> drivers with a high concentration in the old oss core which should
> be killed anyway. And unfortunately a few relatively recent additions
> like the SGI xpc driver or usbvision driver
can we also make sure that checkpatch.pl catches any new addition?
(not saying checkpatch.pl is the end-all, but the people who do run it
at least have now have a chance ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
lwoodman@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
minchan.kim@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Mark sleep_on as deprecated
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:04:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091214080452.18516dc1@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091214130302.GA25797@infradead.org>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:03:02 -0500
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:24:40PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> >
> > sleep_on() function is SMP and/or kernel preemption unsafe. we
> > shouldn't use it on new code.
>
> And the best way to archive this is to remove the function.
>
> In Linus' current tree I find:
>
> - 5 instances of sleep_on(), all in old and obscure block drivers
> - 2 instances of sleep_on_timeout(), both in old and obscure drivers
these should both die; the sleep_on() ones using BROKEN in Kconfig..
.. sleep_on() has not worked in the 2.6 series ever.... ;)
>
> - 28 instances of interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(), mostly in obscure
> drivers with a high concentration in the old oss core which should
> be killed anyway. And unfortunately a few relatively recent additions
> like the SGI xpc driver or usbvision driver
can we also make sure that checkpatch.pl catches any new addition?
(not saying checkpatch.pl is the end-all, but the people who do run it
at least have now have a chance ;-)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-14 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 131+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 21:46 [PATCH v2] vmscan: limit concurrent reclaimers in shrink_zone Rik van Riel
2009-12-11 21:46 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 0:14 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 0:14 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 4:09 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 4:09 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 4:19 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 4:19 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 4:29 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 4:29 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 5:00 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 5:00 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:23 ` [cleanup][PATCH 1/8] vmscan: Make shrink_zone_begin/end helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:34 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:34 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 22:39 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 22:39 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/8] Mark sleep_on as deprecated KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-14 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-12-14 16:04 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-12-14 16:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-14 14:34 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:34 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 22:44 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 22:44 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/8] Don't use sleep_on() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:35 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:35 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 22:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 22:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] Use prepare_to_wait_exclusive() instead prepare_to_wait() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:33 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:33 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-15 0:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 0:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 5:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 5:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 8:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 8:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 14:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 14:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 14:58 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-15 14:58 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-15 18:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 18:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 18:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 18:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-15 19:33 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-15 19:33 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-16 0:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-16 0:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-16 2:44 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-16 2:44 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-16 5:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-16 5:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-14 23:03 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 23:03 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] Use io_schedule() instead schedule() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 23:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 23:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 0:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 0:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 1:13 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 1:13 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] Stop reclaim quickly when the task reclaimed enough lots pages KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:45 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:45 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 23:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 23:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 0:11 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 0:11 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 0:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 0:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] Use TASK_KILLABLE instead TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:47 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:47 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 23:52 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 23:52 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 12:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm: Give up allocation if the task have fatal signal KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 14:48 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 14:48 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-14 23:54 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-14 23:54 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 0:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 0:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 1:03 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 1:03 ` Minchan Kim
2009-12-15 1:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 1:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:40 ` [PATCH v2] vmscan: limit concurrent reclaimers in shrink_zone KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 12:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-14 17:08 ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-14 17:08 ` Larry Woodman
2009-12-15 0:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 0:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <20091217193818.9FA9.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
2009-12-17 12:23 ` FWD: " Larry Woodman
2009-12-17 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-17 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-17 19:55 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-17 19:55 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-17 21:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-12-17 21:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-12-17 22:52 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-17 22:52 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 16:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-12-18 16:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-12-18 17:43 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 17:43 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 10:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-18 10:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-18 14:09 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 14:09 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 13:38 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-18 13:38 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-18 14:12 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 14:12 ` Rik van Riel
2009-12-18 14:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-12-18 14:13 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091214080452.18516dc1@infradead.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.